Fanboys Anonymous

How Does Superman Get a New Suit for Batman v Superman?

Posted by Saliv - Saturday, August 23, 2014

Greetings, Fanboys and Fangirls! This is Sam Lascio, discussing something that I'm sure must be on most sweaty nerds' minds lately: How does Superman get a new suit in the upcoming Man of Steel sequel, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice?

Give or take the shape of the "S," the style of the shield, or the precise shade of blue and red in his costume, fewer costumes are as iconic as Superman's. When you see that costume, whether you're from America, the UK, China, or the Philippines, whether you're 7 or 70, you know exactly who it is. Superman is one of those heroes who transcends time, even more than Captain America. Superman isn't just an American hero; he's a global protector. So when the first images and trailers dropped for Man of Steel, opinions soared about Superman's "new and improved" costume. His iconic red underwear was missing, the "S" looked strange, he had a textured suit with strange markings on the forearms and sides.

Superman gets a brand new suit in the 2013 film Man of Steel starring Henry Cavill.
The "ta-da!" moment in Man of Steel (2013)
Even with these major alterations, however, most of us either loved it from the start, or it eventually grew on us. That aside, we got one major change from the early comics/previous films. Rather than the suit being developed on Earth (most adaptations have it as a creation of his adoptive mother, Martha Kent), it was created on the Kryptonian ship that would go on to become the iconic Fortress of Solitude. Is this new to most of us geeks? Not really. There are many Superman issues that show that his suit is made from Kryptonian fabric and is thus as indestructible as Superman himself (unless a really powerful villain curb stomps his ass). Unfortunately, this presents a bit of a brick wall when it comes to creativity. As for the new DCCU, new set photos were recently leaked online giving us a better look at Kal's new suit for Batman v Superman.


Comparison of Superman's suit costume from Man of Steel and Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice.
Man of Steel suit vs. Batman v Superman suit.
At first glance, it's obvious the suit is different. First off, it's, well, brighter. A big complaint from Superman fans was that the Man of Steel suit was too dull and faded. It looked like Clark put it through the washing machine too many times with bleach. So I mean, yeah, on the surface, this should totally be a plus, right? It might be a little hard to tell from the pictures, but the BvS suit also sports a more rectangular belt buckle than the MoS suit, on which the buckle is more of an oval. Also, it's only a slight difference, but look at the collar. Notice anything? The "S" shield appears to sit lower on the chest than it does on the MoS suit. This presents a bit of a continuity issue.

From the end of MoS, it's obvious that Clark's battle with Zod didn't rip or tear his suit. If two Kryptonians cutting down Metropolis like a hot knife through butter couldn't so much as cause a pit stain, it's not like he could just take it to a seamstress to get it altered or dye the suit a new shade of blue and red. So what's the deal? I've got three possibilities as to what could account for these variations in the suit.

  1. It actually is a different suit. Just like we have multiple wardrobes in our closets, the Fortress of Solitude contained more than one suit from the House of El. Now, I guess one could argue "Why not just wear the suit he wore in Man of Steel anyway?" Well, do you wear the same clothes each and every day? Oh, you do? Well, uh, moving on then…
  2. The costume department for the film didn't care. Now, that's not to say they don't care about continuity. Remember though, some fans were really butt-hurt over the changes presented in Man of Steel. With that in mind, were they just supposed to ignore those complaints and say "No, if we change anything, it'll screw up continuity"? I'm sure some higher ups were listening to fan complaints and decided to make some tweaks to the design, such as the biggest complaint I heard: the colors. More fans were upset about the dull colors than they were about the missing tighty-whiteys (tighty-reddies?). A little reshaping of the belt buckle, lowering the shield down his chest a tad, they probably figured no one would care enough to complain and write an entire article devoted to it. Wait…shit…
  3. Money. money. money. So, you've decided to make a cinematic universe around the DC comics superheroes. You've also decided to give the public something they've been awaiting for decades: Batman fighting Superman. Let me say that again: Batman. Fighting. Superman. The two most iconic superheroes of all time FIGHTING! YES! HELL YES! You want to make as much money as possible, right? So what do you do? You want kids to buy your toys, right? You want them to wear your t-shirts, carry your backpacks, run around as these characters during Halloween, etc. What's the best way to do this? Change the costume ever so slightly so that little Jimmy and Susie can look at these toys and see that WHOA! They're like, so totally different than the old toys! Jimmy already has his action figures, t-shirts, and pillow cases from Man of Steel, and Susie still has her backpack, blankets, and pajamas from Man of Steel, so what's going to make them buy new shit? Change that shit. Boom, you just made a ton of money, my friend. Look at Iron Man 1-3 or Captain America 1 and 2. The Amazing Spider-Man, Thor, X-Men. The list goes on and on. I think the last notable superhero films that didn't change the costume from the previous film was The Dark Knight Rises or the Sam Raimi Spider-Man trilogy. New costumes means new merchandise means more money.

So there you have it, folks. Are they going to mention that Superman has a new look in Batman v Superman? Probably not. Would it be nice to get a small throw-away line about him having more than one suit? Definitely. If I were a betting man, however, I'd wager that we won't get an explanation, at least in the film. Batman though? Shit, it looks like he'll already have two different suits in the film anyway, not to mention the fact that he's loaded. Bruce Wayne could afford to make thousands of different costumes for any imaginable scenario. I'm sure we'll see his suit change throughout the course of the DCCU, along with the other heroes.

What do you think the reason is behind the change? Was it a continuity fail? Is it perhaps a totally different suit? Or, was it all about the money? Maybe you have a different idea? Let us know in the comments section! Thanks for reading, everyone! My name is Sam Lascio, and I am a Fanboy!

I say this first: if you don't want to know anything about the plot, potential or otherwise, to Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, SPOILERS ABOUND in this article. Tread carefully.

batman v superman dawn of justice warner bros dc comics zack snyder justice league ben affleck

A source inside the Dawn of Justice camp has leaked details about filming the Justice League prequel and talked briefly about the end of the movie and Lex Luthor's plan. As with prior reports on this film, take it with a grain of salt; these are possibilities, not certainties.

At any rate, those SPOILERS I mentioned? They follow.

The source says that Luthor, before and during the course of the film, collects pieces of the destroyed World Engine in an attempt to synthesize Kryptonite. At the end, Batman apparently breaks into Lexcorp to steal said kryptonite—whether in defense of Superman or with intent to use it against him, we don't know. Also by the end, Luthor has gotten hold of General Zod's body and has very specific plans for it…

SPOILERS

…plans that may or may not include using Zod's DNA to create a villain familiar to fans: Doomsday.

superman doomsday dc comics death of superman

Okay. NO MORE SPOILERS.

Now, if the above is true, this movie has deeper ties to the Man of Steel franchise than originally thought. The more we heard about Dawn of Justice, the more it sounded like it had developed into part of the Justice League franchise, rather than the second installment of the Man of Steel franchise. The rumor of no new Man of Steel film until 2018 seemed to confirm the distance this movie was trying to create from its immediate predecessor, but if this film's plot really does set up a big piece of the next solo Superman film, Dawn of Justice occupies a more central space between the JL and Man of Steel franchises than we speculated.

While we're talking about Justice League, it's worth mentioning that a version of the League is rumored to appear by the end of Dawn of Justice: Superman, Batman, Wonder Woman, Aquaman, Cyborg, and the Flash. The first bit of relevant rumor is that Scoot McNairy, cast recently in an unknown role, is playing the Flash. Set photos have appeared showing the actor wearing green-screen socks, and common conjecture hypothesizes this means his legs need CGI work—and which character's legs might need effects work done? Nothing is certain, but it's an interesting clue. We previously wondered which of a few other side-characters McNairy might play, but this is just as possible as any other role. 

scoot mcnairy flash batman v superman dawn of justice set detroit metropolis henry cavill ben affleck
Thoughts? Maybe it's just a fashion statement.
The other notable thing about that particular Justice League lineup is that it excludes Green Lantern. A Flash/Green Lantern movie was a part of DC's rumored film release lineup that came out a few weeks ago, but it sounds like the Justice League movie would serve as an introduction to the character, which makes some sense. Green Lantern is a cosmic, big-picture character, and the threats he deals with (or could bring to Earth) would be good reason to assemble the talents of the Justice League. By this point, also, Shazam will have debuted and would likely be a part of the League. Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson is said to have his choice between playing Shazam or his nemesis, Black Adam, the role to which he was rumored to be attached for a number of years.

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice is gonna be jam packed, that's for sure. Think this sounds like a Luthor plot? Think it's a good way for the films to go? Talk about it in the comments below.

The D-List Ep 4: Top 10 Nicktoons!

Posted by The Dace Man

Watch all your favorite Nickelodeon Shows online free!!What is up, Dacetacular Nation? As if I didn't have enough shows and segments as is, I went and developed another one. The D-List is a weekly Top 10 countdown with me, The Dace Man, and I'll run down my top 10 picks!

Join me in the fourth episode as I give you my Top 10 Nickelodeon NickToons! I will sound off on the iconic characters that live within the NickToons Universe and have ultimately shaped our childhood. Fanboys and Fangirls jump on board the crazy train as I venture across generations of cartoons. I'll journey through time to bring you some of the classic icons as well as pull from the present to give you the fresh faces of tomorrow!

Did I mention one of your favorite NickToons? Am I watching the right cartoons on Nickelodeon? Lastly, for the fourth week in a row, did I manage to outrage the interwebs? Go grab a drink, maybe some snacks, and kick back and enjoy The D-List  for the week of August 18th!



As always, check back regularly to see what Chris "The Dace Man" Dace is looking at (and no, not just porn), as well as all of the other bloggers here at Fanboys Anonymous. Remember, keyboard warriors: leave your feedback! Until the next time, for the few, the proud, and, of course, the Dacetacular, grab a beer—and in this case a list—and check out what's going on here in the Dace-Sphere. See ya next time!

Listen live to The Dace Man Show every Wednesday at 8 p.m. EST on Mega Powers Radio.

Follow on Facebook: Mega Powers Radio | Fanboys Anonymous | The Dace Man Show | Nerd Court | Sports Talk Weekly | Addicted to Anime

RIP Robin Williams podcastOn episode 9 of the Fanboys Anonymous Group Meeting podcast, the panel has a roundtable discussion about the pressures of being famous.

This is in honor of the recent passing of the comedic genius Robin Williams, who had struggled with substance abuse problems and depression.

Hosted by Tony Mango, the panel includes Mike Paden, Eddie Siqueira and Caroline Oliveira.


Some topics we address:

  • Child stars being raised in the wrong environment
  • Predisposition to self-destructive behavior
  • The sad importance of drug culture in Hollywood
  • The media's fascination with a failing celebrity
  • Celebs being hounded by the paparazzi
  • and more!
You can watch the podcast below. Make sure to subscribe!




logo Stitcher Radio icon transparent logo iTunes icon transparent

Storm #2 Cover Standard
Storm #2 Cover by Ibanez
"Thunder and lightning, very, very frightening…"

Okay, so Freddie Mercury wasn't singing about Storm in Bohemian Rhapsody, but still, the thought of someone being able to manipulate the weather on a whim does give some cause for concern. Especially if they use it to vent their frustrations.

In Storm #2 we see the ongoing exploration of Storm as an individual who is loaded with power but holding back due to her role as a queen, headmistress, and all-around mutant figurehead. It's time to cut loose a little.

Greg Pak picks up the theme of using the relationships Storm is involved with, both past and present, to explore her emotional state of mind. The early scene in Storm #2 with Wolverine and Storm in a bar, trying to enjoy some alone time, is touching and poignant given our knowledge of his impending demise. It is here though that we see Storm express overtly her desire to not be "pushed into anyone's box again." Storm is trying to find who she wants to be in this part of her life, and this seems to be what will drive the Storm series forward.

Interior Art for Storm #2 by Victor IbanezStorm, as a character, has been so many different people at different times that finding this sense of self will bring challenges. In Storm #2 this is made manifest when Storm goes searching for a missing young adult Angie.

With the help of Beast, who has some characteristic one liners, Storm tracks Angie through the subway only to stumble upon an old nemesis, Callisto. Because of the underground setting, we are reminded of Storm's dread fear of confined spaces and claustrophobia.

What ensues is Storm's discovery of a reformed Callisto, helping runaways by providing safe shelter. Storm is forced to rethink who Callisto is and the potential for change. You get a sense here that pride is an issue for Storm, not easily overcome.

Marevls Storm controls the weather
The art by Victor Ibanez retains the earthy feel from issue #1. This is obviously a visual link to Storm's African origin story. Ibanez does well to electrify the fight scene between Storm and Callisto and mixes well the use of panel decisions and layouts. There are subtle details that Ibanez has included (whether by direction for Pak or not, we cannot be sure) such as Storm's ear com-piece, which links back into the story a few pages later.

The potential is still there for Storm and from what information Pak has provided in interviews, the exploration of Storm's character and relationships with other key mutant figures will provide ample storylines for future issues. The impact of the Death of Wolverine series in September will have monumental ramifications for Storm because of the romance between the headmaster and headmistress of the Jean Grey School.

What did you like in this month's issue of Storm? How will the death of Wolverine impact Storm? Leave your comments below and come back next month for the build up to AXIS.

I'm a huge, huge, Spider-Man fan. He's my favorite fictional character of all time. I read the comics when I was a kid and enjoyed most of the animated shows of the past 50 years. Some are good, some are great, others are less than stellar. I even own the short-run live-action TV show from the '70s on DVD. Yep, it's out there and available and not that bad of a show.

Spider-Man 2 Doc Ock vs Spidey
When the first theatrical version hit the screens in 2002 I was excited. When the movie was actually above and beyond all expectations any of us fans could have hoped for, my excitement was through the roof. When director Sam Raimi followed this up two years later with the best superhero film of all time in Spider-Man 2, the stakes were raised even more. Sony then pressured Sam Raimi to add a character he had no interest in (Venom) and this studio tinkering led to mixed results with Spider-Man 3.

Although flawed, SM3 has the best CGI of the series and some of the best action sequences ever in a superhero film. Watch that Sandman creation scene again, it's amazing. One of the biggest complaints of the film is the "Emo" Peter scene where Tobey Maguire dances down the sidewalk. Here's the thing, though: anyone who complains about this simply does not understand the character. See, Peter Parker is such a nerd he even fails at acting cool. That's who he is. Parker isn't some smooth skater punk like Andrew Garfield attempts to be in the first Amazing Spider-Man. More on that later.

When Raimi balked at the rush job they wanted for SM4, Sony decided to reboot. Fine. But what's most frustrating is that if they had given him what he wanted (a release date in 2012), we would have gotten his film anyway that year! Unbelievable. Majorly influenced by the success of The Dark Knight, Sony decided to go the darker, grittier route, and the following is why they and the writers failed at portraying Spider-Man on film.
Amazing Spider-Man vs cops
There has been much talk about Garfield's Spidey being great because he quips and uses humor more. I agree Raimi didn't focus on this enough, but anyone who thinks this is why his Web Slinger is better is clueless about the character. Sorry, but it's true. Spider-Man uses his humor for two main reasons. The first is because he's scared to death about fighting dangerous criminals or super villains. It is a defense mechanism. He doesn't use it to humiliate people like Garfield did in the single scene he does quip in The Amazing Spider-Man when he stops the car thief. That scene was horrid; it made me sick, mostly because people just don't get it. Garfield was a complete and total jerk to that cop, too.

The second reason he uses humor is to distract someone who is more powerful than he is in an attempt to get them to make a mistake so he can beat them. Sports figures do this on occasion. Give me an example of where Garfield uses this tactic for this purpose. In the first scene with Rhino in The Amazing Spider-Man 2, Spidey had the situation well in hand and there was absolutely no reason to ask the future Rhino to "roll the window down" or make fun of him or pull his pants down at the end when he was already captured. Funny scene, but not why Spidey uses humor.

Another reason they failed with these reboots, the biggest one, is shoving Uncle Ben's storyline to the background and then attempting (unsuccessfully) to add in something with Peter's parents. Uncle Ben's death is the sole reason Peter becomes Spider-Man, and neglecting the line "With great power comes great responsibility" undermines the entire basis of this character's core motivation. Webb and co. aren't concerned with character or story, just pretty lights and going with trends.

With great power comes great responsibility

This glaring offense is so egregious it stuns me to the core. How can anyone claim to be a Spider-Man fan and be okay with this? He becomes a superhero because he is tormented by his own failure to act when he could have stopped the thief who eventually killed his uncle. To omit this is to not mention the cross when speaking of Jesus' sacrifice. It's insane.

I'm such a huge Spider-Man fan that I have no choice but to be on board with these films, and I do think Garfield makes an excellent Spider-Man in the action scenes. His Peter Parker needs some work, but in ASM2 he was less of a jerk than in the first one, so it looks promising. Yes, I also enjoyed ASM2 more than ASM simply because it was more fun, more in tune with the spirit of the comic books, and more similar to Raimi's take on the character.

sexy Spider-Man couple Emma Stone and Andrew Garfield
Then again, we now have a film series that is fast becoming schizophrenic and can't decide what kind of tone it wants. ASM2 was a mess from start to finish, also failing with the characters of Gwen and Peter, but admittedly less so than in ASM. The only reason these characters are together is because they are hot, nothing else. They both look like models. This is geeky Peter Parker? Please.

Examine Peter and Mary Jane from Raimi's trilogy: he loves her because she was/is the girl next door, and every single man alive knows this feeling. She also talks to him, unlike every other girl alive, and sticks up for him. Mary Jane loves him because Peter represents the nice guy, a man who will treat her better than every other man in her life. Her father, Flash Thompson, her boss at the diner—they all treat her like garbage. Peter won't. He will protect her and be devoted to her hopes and dreams and support Mary Jane in anything she pursues. Peter Parker is the kind of man she needs in her life to make her life better.

Can anyone defend these choices? Does anyone really believe these films are in any way superior to the previous trilogy? Sound off below.

Sandman Neil Gaiman DC Comics vertigo joseph gordon levitt david goyerThe dream is that much closer to reality, Sandman fans!

Studios have been trying to get a Sandman movie off the ground for years. The property has gone through many hands and many false starts, most recently passing to David Goyer and Joseph Gordon-Levitt, who both will at least produce. It's thought that Levitt might direct as well, and potentially take a role in the film.

Given the flurry of comic book adaptations in this era of moviemaking, chances are good this version of Sandman will come together sooner or later. It's true also that books from DC's Vertigo imprint, like Sandman, have been consistently adapted to film over the years—A History of Violence, The Losers, V for Vendetta, and Constantine were all Vertigo publications. David Goyer's central role in bringing DC properties to screen also shows a degree of confidence in this project.

Levitt spoke recently about the status of Sandman and mentioned meeting and working closely with Goyer, screenwriter Jack Thorne, and creator Neil Gaiman himself. It's encouraging to know the filmmakers have Gaiman on their side to develop the story for the screen. Also worth noting is that Jack Thorne has experience adapting Gaiman's stories for film, having worked on a treatment and the script for Gaiman's novel The Ocean at the End of the Lane. Levitt also makes mention of incorporating the Sandman's larger universe into their storytelling, which again sounds like a step in the right direction. The world Gaiman created around Morpheus (or Dream, or the Sandman…) is a rich, vibrant and deep one, and the filmmakers would do themselves a disservice not to use it in some fashion.

This project is also notable for being outside the rest of the DC Comics' films continuity. Gaiman, as a writer, made occasional nods to the more traditional DC publications during his work on Sandman, but the filmmakers may want to keep this universe more closed. I've written about it before, but the power levels involved in the world of the Sandman dwarf any problems that the Justice League might face.

Think Sandman is on the right track? Do you have faith in JGL, or is Goyer gonna sink the ship? Talk about it in the comments; maybe they'll hear you.

There's no stopping Marvel! Yet again they reveal some exciting news for one of their properties. This time it pertains to their hit show Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. (henceforth AoS) and a new character added to the mix. The Absorbing Man, also known as Crusher Creel, will make an appearance in the season 2 premiere. Marvel had this to say:

agents of shield casting news new character
"With his ability to absorb the properties of anything he touches, Creel will put Coulson and his team through their paces when their second season kicks off… but you'll have to wait until then to see how their battle turns out!"

Well, sounds thrilling to me. Although the show started off slow, AoS picked it up nicely toward the end of the first season and finished very strong. Coinciding with the events of Captain America: Winter Soldier, the last several episodes were tense, nail-biting affairs that had me watching and waiting for the next episode each week. They should be lauded for picking up the pace and making every second count.

Judging by the character's comic book roots, Absorbing Man should give the Agents all they can handle and more. This is  good thing. Why the show didn't work at first is mostly because there were no stakes and not many reasons to cheer for them. Once they got it going, though, AoS blossomed and took off fast. Here's hoping they continue the trend in season 2.

Does this news sound exciting to you? Is Absorbing Man a good villain to fight the good guys on this show? Sound off below.

Magneto #8 Cover
It's the quite ones you need to watch out for...

It's debatable if you can label Magneto a 'quite one', but his approach to retribution isn't about throwing large metal objects around anymore. It can't be as his powers are lacking of late.

Despite this, the gravitas of action is brought to the fore in clever ways that feel more impressive for the lack of overt macho-come smash-em-ness. It is this clear point of difference that brings the appeal of a series focused on Magneto straight to the front. Cullen Bunn plays on this well and has done so since issue #1. However, with Magneto #8, we start to see this develop in ways I hadn't expected.

There is some great transitional art on display here that really draws out the story and character of Magneto, both past and present. Having just re-read all of this series, it is very apparent just what a character driven series Magneto is.

While this may seem obvious, on the flip side, the action is toned down to allow for this. It is the subtlety that is developed by the use of narration by Magneto's thoughts that help drives this process. Don't get me wrong, an issue of Magneto without a revenge murder would seem a little fanciful at this point, but it wouldn't go so far as to say the style is in your face.

Magneto #8 Interior art by FernandezGiven this, we are seeing a change in how the story may flow from this point. While, up to now, Magneto has been driven to avenge mutant hate crimes and revenge those targeted for having a different genetic make up, this Dexter-ish approach seems to have brought Magneto to a new purpose. The more personal touch of overcoming his diminished powers is a great plot to follow and, lets face it, this has been branded across each issue as a constant reminder.

The art by Javier Fernandex, though not as jarring as Garbiel Walta, has a complementary style in this Magneto #8. The gritty darkness that envelopes this series is wonderfully captured by both artists. The tone is driven home by darker shades and palette of colorist Dan Brown.

Another nice touch is the consistent use of white on black for the narration lettering. Cory Petit adds weight with this approach to the feel of the series, and contrasts the spoken word bubbles which remain black on white. In all, the art is cohesive to ensure it is bringing out the best aspects of the story and not stopping the readers flow.

Magneto #8 the different faces of MagnetoDuring Magneto #7 and #8, we are provided the connection to Mutant Growth Hormone story line that has recently concluded in Uncanny X-Men. Bunn is using this and the appearance of Magneto back in the later series to link the mutant worlds together.

For me the end of Magneto #8 is particularly satisfying. The build up to AXIS has begun for Magneto. Will we see a return to former glory? There is still much more for Bunn to explore. Briar Raleigh's role still remains unclear, the use of The Marauders and what Magneto's role in AXIS are just some of the bigger facets still to be teased out.

What did you think of this months issue of Magneto? How will this play into the March to AXIS next month? Leave you thoughts and comments below.

Review of Hamblin Comics
Raw creativity from Hamblin Comics
"You give up on your dreams when your fear out weighs your faith". The slogan of Hamblin Comics website says a lot about their approach as an independent comic publisher.

It is clear from the quotes by collaborating artists on the website that the driving force behind Hamblin Comics, Austin Hamblin is a young talent with a bright future.

This is evident from Hamblin's most recent publication, the self published The Adventures of Punk and Rock.

Issue #1 displays a good comic from a creator who is trying to find a balance in his work and an audience with a particular taste. As with a lot of independent comics produced, Punk and Rock pushes the boundaries in some aspects in both art and narrative.

This sort of creativity should not be stifled, but harnessed in a positive manner. Given this, Punk and Rock requires you to let go some sensibility and take a fresh look at what is alternative currently.

The story flows in a logical manner, although the placement of sequences could be enhanced with further editing to maximize the transition of pages or panels. A consistent use of full page panels, over layered with smaller inserts, is a stand out feature as a story mechanism, though at times this was distracting due to some panel placements.

The art by Scott Twells is whimsical as it balances a "bad assery" approach to a couple of anti-hero characters with a rough and ready manner. Heavy brush strokes in the water color style offsets the dialogue in the script with a softness that tries to balance the content. Twells creative approach to depicting alien beings as protagonists is cute.

The story itself, penned by Hamblin, is pretty clear cut. The interaction between the 'narrator', Snarky, and the other characters is a refreshing touch to lift the progress of the story along. There are even aspects where attempts are made at 'breaking the fourth wall'.

Overall, the comic has potential to grow, so keep an eye out in the future for this and further work from Hamblin Comics on the website (http://hamblincomics.com/). Check them out and let me know what you think by leaving a comment below.

One of the glaring absences from the recent Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles reboot was the lack of a core character, Casey Jones. Fans have naturally been speculating that the hockey mask wearing vigilante would make an appearance in the sequel that has been announced. If that is going to happen, who should play the part? Hollywood is packed to the brim with talented guys that could pull it off, but who stands out in our minds? On this edition of FANBOYS CAST, several members of the website discuss who they would like to see take on the role of April O'Neil's love interest—as much as she wouldn't want to admit it.

WHO SHOULD PLAY CASEY JONES IN TEENAGE MUTANT NINJA TURTLES SEQUEL?

Nicholas D'Agosto (Tony Mango's choice)

Casey Jones Nicholas D'Agosto shirtless
Casey Jones to me consists of basically four different characteristics all combined into one person that somewhat embodies the collective mindsets of all four turtles. First and foremost, he must be humorous. He's interacting with giant mutant karate expert turtles, but after the initial shock, he's game. This puts him in a good spot with Mikey, being able to play off the other's jokes. The original '90s film had a great scene where he and Donatello bonded over fixing the car, showing that he's not a complete lunkhead. Obviously, there's the jerk mentality that he brings to the table. This puts him at odds with Raphael, but eventually leads to a mutual respect. Then, there are times where Casey steps up to the plate and can be a true leader, like Leonardo.

Nicholas D'Agosto has all of these in his repertoire. His time on Heroes showcased a rebellious side where he was charming in his anti-hero ways. He's kind of a prick in it and defies authority, but he does it with a smile on his face. He eventually succumbs to his good heart rather than being all about his own desires. He's done some comedies since then, which allowed him to improve on his acting chops and comedic timing. D'Agosto is close enough to Megan Fox's age and handsome enough to be a justifiable love interest. I doubt there would be an issue with him pulling off the action required of him.
 
Three other names that I had considered when thinking about this were Kellan Lutz, Garrett Hedlund, and Jared Padalecki (who I almost went with, but decided that he would probably cost more money in comparison to D'Agosto). All in all, D'Agosto has a cocky sense of humor, but doesn't rub people the wrong way, which is exactly what Casey Jones does to not only April O'Neil, but the rest of the team.

Taylor Kitsch or Zac Efron (Sam Lascio's choice)

There are two different ways we can go with casting an actor to play Casey Jones:

shirtless Zac Efron abs musclesFirst, the studio could go with someone younger. Megan Fox herself is 28, but they could get an actor in his mid-to-late 20s. The Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles reboot was made primarily for younger audiences, and with this in mind, I would choose Zac Efron. Now, let's all take a deep breath. When we think of Casey Jones, our minds don't automatically go to the kid from High School Musical, but have you seen the guy lately? The dude's got some muscles. Not to mention that actors put on muscle mass (or lose muscle mass) for roles all the time. Efron could totally bulk up more and pull off the intimidating physique of Casey Jones. This would draw in that younger audience they're looking for, but I think Zac Efron could give even us older fanboys a great incarnation of the character.


Casey Jones Taylor Kitsch Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles
Now, the studio could also go with a slightly older actor. This would give us a Casey Jones that would be older than Megan Fox, but not so much older that it's creepy. You know, like they tried doing with Will Arnett? Call me old fashioned, but a 44 year old trying to hit on a 28 year old just seemed odd, and I think the general movie-going audience agreed. With that in mind, I'd go with 33 year old Canadian actor Taylor Kitsch. Aside from giving us a sub-par, albeit not completely trashed, performance as Gambit in X-Men Origins: Wolverine, I thought his acting in John Carter was one of the highlights of the film. He tried to have a break out role in Gambit and it didn't work out. He tried to carry a film with John Carter and THAT didn't work out. However, I believe that if he were to be cast as Casey Jones, that he's got the look, he could give us the attitude, and he could reignite the flame of an old fan favorite character that we all loved from the 1990 film played by Elias Koteas (we won't talk about the 3rd film in '93).

Jason David Frank (Mike Paden's choice)

Green Ranger Jason David Frank White Ranger MMA FighterCasey Jones is a rough, yet cheesy character. It requires a certain look and attitude to portray accurately. For me, the perfect mix lays with the former Mighty Morphin Power Ranger turned MMA fighter Jason David Frank. His skills earned while fighting give legitimacy to his tough-guy persona while his time as a Ranger showed his ability to act for a young audience, yet still put on an entertaining performance for all ages. Perhaps he can call in the Dragonzord to battle the Technodrome? Fun fact: JDF's second professional MMA fight was against Chris Rose, who made his entrance wearing a Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles robe.


Who do you think should be cast as Casey Jones?
Leave your fan cast choices below!

how to write comics and make it in the business by brian bendis"Words for Pictures" it doesn't get much clearer than the title of Brian Michael Bendis' new exposition on the art of making comics.

Bendis is a best selling comic book writer and a tour-de-force behind some of Marvels most iconic characters. He is a multi-Eisner award winning author. So when it comes to knowing a little something to the comic business, I feel we can probably trust him on this.Words for Pictures is fulsome of how this master of the craft has cracked the comics business.

This book focuses on a writers is point of view, but is well balanced with the multi-faceted collaborative partners required to make a full comic come to life.

While it isn't a how-to-create-comics like Brian Bendis treatise, Words for Picture does provide valuable insight into how to mould your craft using insider information and lessons learned over a continuous career in the comics industry.

It is also noted very early on that the lessons in this book are built on a solid foundation of trial and error. In fact the forward by Joe Quesada is explicit that "if your not falling, your not trying hard enough". However, it is Bendis' early life lessons that come to the fore, as the reason why he has written Words for Pictures. There wasn't anything like this accessible when Bendis was beginning out, so he feels the need to help the next generation of aspirational comic writers here.

To compliment the wonderful guide provided, there are an array of helpful real script pages from various artist known to Bendis. It showcases art in progressive states from pencils to finished product and even a full chapter on the business side of the comics process. This finished product is glossy and extremely easy to read. This makes the appeal much broader as a result.

comics writer Brian Bendis
Brian Michael Bendis
The great honesty in the approach taken by Bendis in exploring how to write and make comics is refreshing. Their is no show-boating, just a down to earth 'this is how to do it' mentality. It is clear that the teacher in Bendis is on display, perhaps the university classes he takes on the subject have helped hone how to aim at even a novice like me.

If you have even an inkling that you would want to get into the comic writing business, this is a must read for you. There are a great many How-To books on the subject, from many outstanding authors. However, for a creator at the top of his game and still going strong, this has weight and substance to back up the content easily.

Words for Pictures is a highly worthwhile read for writers, artists and fans alike. I know I enjoyed it, but what did you think? Have you read this yet? Leave your thoughts below or even suggestions for other comic writing help material.

So often in Hollywood, we have bright stars that burn out. They come and go so fast that they can be described much akin to comets, something celestial that passed through our world and was gone before we had a chance to fully appreciate their splendor. James Dean is an example of a film star who had only three starring roles during his brief 24 years on this earth yet has since become an icon.

Bruce Lee is also one of these bright candles that burned bright yet blew out fast. With the exception of some work as a background player in several Chinese films, Lee did very little in the area of film. He only had four completed movies and one that was partially finished when he died at the age of 32 in 1973. He also co-starred in a few TV shows. Most notably of which was The Green Hornet as Kato, Green Hornet's hard fighting sidekick.

bruce lee hollywood legend dies young
Owner of one of the most dazzling screen presences of all time, Lee was the Grandfather of Kung Fu movies. It's impossible to take your eyes off him while he's on screen. Try it. I bet you can't do it. Lee was magnetic, electric, and brimmed over with charisma. Not only was his philosophy about the human body being a conduit for spiritual power transcendent, his impact on popular culture cannot be underestimated. He simply oozed something special. Watching him move was so hypnotizing it was like experiencing a physical symphony. 

Before Bruce Lee broke into Hollywood, Kung Fu was a lesser known, hardly respected sub-genre few knew much about. After his Western break through Enter the Dragon and subsequent shocking death, Kung Fu was everywhere, including wannabe Bruce Lees popping up attempting to cash in on the style and name. Many movies tried to put some martial arts in there, even when it wasn't needed (here's looking at you, The Man with the Golden Gun). This demonstrates how well regarded and influential Lee was to the world of martial arts.

An argument could be made that Lee already peaked with Enter the Dragon because it is hard to imagine there being a better martial arts film than this one. Sure, it's Dr. No meets Kung Fu, but it works so well to showcase everything Lee had to offer the world. It's such a shame he never got to see the outcome and enjoy the success of breaking through in America. We'll never know what might have been, only that his star power was enough to light a fire for all things related to what he believed in: exercise and physical fitness combined with a healthy spirit.

bruce lee celebrity death died too young from drugs
So if you have never seen a Bruce Lee film, check them out in this order: The Big Boss, Fists of Fury, Way of the Dragon (also called Return of the Dragon), Enter the Dragon, and then the unfinished The Game of Death, where he famously fights off Kareem Abdul-Jabbar. It's amazing that he was only in the film for like ten minutes, yet that scene is one of the most watched in history.

Anyone else a huge fan? Has anyone never seen him in action? Sound off below on some of your favorite moments of this huge cinematic icon.

Week in Geek: Wednesday August 20th, 2014

Posted by Jeff Penner - Wednesday, August 20, 2014

Want to know what happened the past few days in nerd culture? WEEK IN GEEK is your quick fix to catch up with the rest of the fanboys out there.

Nerdy current events in geek culture for this week
MOVIES

The Rock….of Eternity?

My take: Dwayne Johnson will be featured in a Shazam movie in some way, shape or form. He may be the hero or he could be his arch-nemesis, Black Adam. I don't have any problem with the casting, I think Johnson can be great. What I do have a problem with (as you'll know, if you read this column weekly) is DC Comics and Warner Bros. They are stacking the deck with something they don't have a handle on, whatsoever. When Iron Man came out with a fun and quirky personality to it, it very well could have still bombed. If that happened, they would have changed gears and tried again. Man of Steel needed a change in gears but it certainly didn't need to be cancelled as a film series.

Star Wars Blu Rays?

My take: Disney is possibly pulling our legs to get the hype even higher for the upcoming Episode VII release next year. As a fan, I regret not getting the 2006 DVD's that had these original films included and I would love to see a Blu-Ray release of them. However, as soon as the fact that Disney is considering releasing them next year, we hear that they own the originals but not the distribution rights. How is that possible? Legal mumbo jumbo! Just make this happen!

Edge of Tomorrow DVD Gets Title Changed.

My take: Why do does Warner Bros. want to change the title of a movie to it's tagline? Nobody knows but it sure has people talking about the film again…so…genius move? If you didn't see this movie in theatres and it's still available to you locally, please go see it. Warner Bros. did this same thing with The Iron Giant; they had no idea what they had and no idea how to market it properly. This movie is a clever and charming action sci-fi adventure that plays like a video game. Boom. Done. WB, I await my job offer.

Will Marvel Make an Inhumans Movie?

My take: If they thought Guardians of the Galaxy was risky, I think they're crazy. The moment I heard they were making it, I knew that someone, somewhere, at some meeting made a brilliant decision and it would be a hit. However, as big a fan I am of Marvel's cosmos stories, The Inhumans is one sector I could just never get behind. I don't mind them being included or a plot point but it would take some extremely clever storytelling to make me look forward to a movie about them and their history and their ongoing politics.

No More Origin Superhero Movies.

My take: Speaking of brilliant decisions, Marvel is steering away from the superhero origin movie. With the success of Guardians of the Galaxy, it's pretty clear moviegoers don't need to be pandered to anymore. They don't need to know how someone got powers in anything longer than a flashback or line of dialogue. Marvel doesn't have time for origins at this point. To keep up with the stories and the franchise, other heroes and characters introduced need to be ready to go if Thanos shows up tomorrow. Also, there are literally millions of copies of source material you can go to if you're curious. Find a local comic book store or hop on Comixology if you have a tablet.

TELEVISION

Cast of Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. Still Expanding.

My take: Knowing that the TV series is connected to the films makes this show a key player to keep an eye on. I never got into it, myself but am most certainly interested in Adrianne Palicki being cast as Mockingbird. The only real reason, if I must be honest, is I think she's distractingly gorgeous.

Star Wars Rebels to Premiere October 3rd.

My take: I've already committed myself to watching this show and giving Disney a full chance to save this franchise for me. I have been completely disillusioned since 1999 came along. The more footage I see, however, the more I fear this show may still need a kick in the butt. I think the voice actors are doing a great job, the music is also a great match. The animation, however, seems almost sloppy and clunky when compared to The Clone Wars. That style wasn't my favorite but it was stern and precise while this show looks like they gave gravity the day off and make way too much use of camera movements. However, all I've seen are clips and trailers and can't speak much more aside from speculation. Either way, I'm looking forward to what they've done to expand the universe.

COMIC BOOKS

Superior Foes of Spider-Man Ending?

My take: I just found this out today, not sure when it was announced but that is a bummer. I just got into this series recently and it's a blast. With all the dramatic stories out there, it's nice to have something that's fun and funny. It's too bad books like this don't seem to last too long in the Big Two's libraries.

Batman Books Getting Overhaul.

My take: With new editors on the Batman books, it's nice to see DC's *shudder* New 52 getting it's first, real makeover. Not every bat-book needs to star Batman and it's nice to see books like Grayson and Batgirl trying something new with plot and design.

DC's Multiversity Starts.

My take: A writer on my "most questionable" list, Grant Morrison, started the DC universe on it's new path this week. With comedy and breaking of the fourth wall, this isn't what many were expecting. Captain Carrot hopes to be DC's answer to Rocket Raccoon and I don't think they'll end up pulling that off. DC's multiverse is only entertaining for fans who've followed the books for more than 20 years, or those new who really, really enjoy doing research (as I once was). It's getting harder and harder to follow DC stories and to know which characters are the ones we're supposed to care about. Personally, I think they had their act together up until Infinite Crisis and things fell apart and imploded with Final Crisis.

Watch out for this segment each and every Wednesday. We'll see you next week!


Did we miss something? What are your thoughts on these topics? Leave us a comment below!

Bilateral Comics CODE 991
CODE 991: An alien black
and white crime caper.
Independent and alternative comic publications are as important as any mainstream publisher in the industry.

As I review comics, it's a joy to see the work of artists striving to find a place among all that is out there in our big wide world.

Given this, allow me to introduce Bilateral Comics, created by David Heath.

At Bilateral Comics, which started publishing in March this year, there are two separate series: 1) an ongoing, continuing story called Valley-01 that has multiple issues and 2) a collection one-shot, individual stories with a clear beginning and end.

Code-991 reviewed here is the fourth of those from the second series.

Jeff Millet, a Burkon City detective, is a policeman with with a conscience. It is very apparent from the outset that his tale is a moralistic statement on the need for people to act more humanely with others. This is more keenly recognizable when Jeff encounters something very unexpected, an Alien stranded in his city.

I like the plot point regarding our interactions with foreign or different people, embodied here by the alien 'Jessica'. Heath provides an insightful tale with an easily identifiable lead character. The pacing is considerate, especially when taking into account the issues length is not as long as your mainstream comic alternatives. This is also supported by a layout and panel arrangement that is suitable for the crime noir nature of this comic.

The art in Code-991 is by Anita Zaramella and captures the gritty, moody police drama that readily lends itself to this story. The cover plays a nice juxtaposition with the black and white imagery of a slimed, maleficent creature over a trench-coat wearing, smoking figure. This moody approach is continued throughout the issue, but highlighted by a strong use of black backed boarders.


Code-991 moody cop noir
Interior art shows a moody, gritty approach.
Zaramella's use of color in the art is polished by a consistent use of shadow and scarce use of contrasting colors through Code-991. The line work and inking is clean in most of the art work, however, the noticeable lack of background details is apparent. The pay off for this approach is that the main characters and story details remain in focus.

Code-991 is very nice introduction to the work of Bilateral Comics. It has piqued my interest and I will definitely check out their other work as it comes out in the future.

Bilateral Comics releases their comics for free at www.bilateralcomics.com with a new page being posted every Tuesday and Thursday. They're also available for purchase (in either print or digital formats) from their website.

Have you checked out any other work from Bilateral Comics, what did you think? Can you recommend any other independent or alternative comics? Let us at Fanboys Anonymous know and leave your comments below.

As if The Rock didn't have enough things to be thankful for, here comes another reason for him to be loving life. Not only is he buff and all that and has fans around the world, Johnson is a former world heavyweight champion in wrestling and also is one of the top box office draws in Hollywood right now. As Marvel and DC square off (you like that wrestling reference I threw in?) in the cinematic ring, both studios attempt to pick up as much A-List talent as possible, and now Johnson gets his pick of what role to play in an upcoming film.

Captain Marvel Dwayne Rock Johnson Black Adam
In their latest move, DC has given Johnson the choice between two characters: either play the hero Shazam or his arch enemy Black Adam. To make it short and direct, Shazam is like Superman and Black Adam is simply a dark version of him. That's it. They have the same exact powers. Listen, comics, especially DC from their early days, were very simple when they first started. There was very little complexity built in; that came later with Marvel. Sorry, but DC is mainly Batman and Superman and little else. The rest of the bunch are either clones like these two or lame like Aquaman.

So what will Dwayne Johnson pick? He looks more like Black Adam in build, and since it is more fun to play bad guys, I think he may pick that. Plus, he's had little chance to be a main villain in many of his films, so why not? The only downside is that if he is the villain in one film, Johnson is less likely to come back because it is usually the good guy that returns in the sequel to fight another bad guy. Either way, I think he'll totally kill it big time. The guy is a beast.

So who will he choose and what will this mean for the future of DC's cinematic universe, such as it is? Will Johnson bring his A-game to the role? Sound off below.

Production has started on Marvel's Ant-Man, with principal photography beginning early this week.

Our first taste of the film has come in the form of a new image released, showing Paul Rudd as the protagonist of the movie, Scott Lang.

Ant-Man first image of Paul Rudd

While it doesn't reveal too much beyond what we already know of the Scott Lang character as a thief, Rudd seems to be living up to the con-man part with is attire.

With all of the delays and the shifting back and forth of behind the scene personalities, it is good to know that Marvel is finally getting back on track and kicking this thing into gear.

Ant-Man will be released in theaters July 17, 2015.

Directed by: Peyton Reed
Written by: Andrew Barrer, Gabriel Ferrari, Adam McKay
Starring: Paul Rudd, Evangeline Lilly, Corey Stoll, Judy Greer, John Slattery, Michael Peña, and Michael Douglas

Peter O'Toole: The Greatest Actor Never to Win Best Actor

Posted by Unknown - Tuesday, August 19, 2014

Peter O'Toole was an absolute beast of an actor. He had something special, a rare combination of looks and deep, affecting screen presence. Richard Burton said this of the late actor:

"He looked like a beautiful, emaciated secretary bird… his voice had a crack like a whip… most important of all you couldn't take your eyes off him… acting is usually regarded as a craft and I claim it to be nothing more except in the hands of the odd few men and women who, once or twice in a lifetime, elevate it into something odd and mystical and deeply disturbing. I believe Peter O'Toole to have this strange quality."

Peter O'Toole in Lawrence of Arabia
O'Toole had that "it" factor in spades and could act most others into oblivion. So strong was his presence that he often buried other actors during scenes and it must have been hard to share films with him. He never seemed overbearing or a jerk about anything, but rather simply a powerful force of nature, unbridled and unstoppable once unleashed. His body of works stands with the all time greats of the industry.

Why did Peter O'Toole never win an Oscar for Best Actor? He is considered by many to be the greatest actor never to have won and, his Honorary Oscar in 2003 notwithstanding, I agree. The biggest factor, believe it or not, was simply bad timing. It seems like every time he was nominated (a staggering 8 times), there was someone else that gave the performance of a lifetime or O'Toole was deemed "too young" and the Academy seldom gave out the statue to youngsters at that time.

O'Toole started strong like nobody's business. His first nomination came in 1962 for Lawrence of Arabia and O'Toole, just 30 years old, lost out to Gregory Peck in To Kill a Mockingbird and, damn, I can't argue too hard against that. Peck's Atticus Finch is an icon and Lawrence was celebrated more for the pageantry/scope of film making than the acting, unfortunately. Two years later, Peter lost to Rex Harrison in My Fair Lady. In the 60's, musicals ruled the decade so Harrison was a lock.

I've never seen Cliff Robertson in Charly, but O'Toole was denied again. The next four times it was impossible for anyone to beat the men that won. John Wayne was rewarded for his full body of work in True Grit (great movie, but not his best, in my opinion). Marlon Brando in The Godfather, Robert De Niro in Raging Bull, and Ben Kingsley in Gandhi. These were once in a lifetime roles and actors that would not be denied. When O'Toole was nominated for the last time in 2006 and lost to Forest Whitaker, he had already accepted his Honorary Oscar.
peter o'toole irish actor celebration of his life's work oscar snub
He initially balked at the idea, saying he was "still in the game" and could still win one on his own. After some admonishment from his children, he decided to take it for what it was: a celebration of his life's work and recognition of his contribution to the world of film. Yeah, it kinda irks me too. The fact they just gave it to him, but in my mind and many other fan's estimation, he earned it and then some.

Is there a better actor that has never won an Academy Award? Who is better than the late, great Peter O'Toole? Sound off below.

Well, here's a big step for Marvel Studios. Perhaps finally feeling the fatigue experienced by many fans and movie goers, Devin Faraci of Badass Digest revealed Marvel's current plans with the Doctor Strange movie script, reporting that the studio is in the process of moving away from the current standard of setting up every new character's initial movie as an origin story. Instead, writer John Spaihts is working on a totally new script apart from the previous iteration that included Dr. Stephen Strange's transformation from surgeon to Sorcerer Supreme and Baron Mordo as the big bad.

This new, unofficial stance (so far, no one at Marvel Studios has confirmed the changed approach to making new superhero movies) reminds me—as well as many comic fans—of Scarlet Witch's famous quote that fixed the Marvel Universe from its dystopian House of M alternate reality in which mutants were the majority species over humanity: "No more mutants."

Follow Fanboys Anonymous for movie news about Avengers: Age of Ultron and Marvel Studios' plans for Phase 3

However, this isn't the first time a Marvel Studios movie will take place in media res. Before it became the independent powerhouse we all know after 2008's Iron Man, Marvel Studios co-produced Blade in 1998 with New Line Cinema—a film which took place mainly in media res, or when Blade was already well into his vampire hunting career. Granted, the movie had a prologue that explained how Blade became the Daywalker, but his origin didn't comprise of the entire length of the movie, unlike Tony Stark's in Iron Man or Steve Rogers' in Captain America: The First Avenger.

Now, this new approach to storytelling doesn't mean that Marvel Studios is going to do away with origin stories completely. How exactly is an audience supposed to accept that Stephen Strange is now the Sorcerer Supreme if he was a surgeon beforehand? I guarantee that somewhere in the movie there will be a brief explanation of the hows and whys of Dr. Strange's rebirth.

The "No more origin stories" approach will usher in a new era of superhero movies, though. After major hiccups like The Amazing Spider-Man (which I still thoroughly enjoy more than watching Tobey Maguire lop around and mope about his girl troubles), audiences may be relieved once other studios pick up on the probable success of the new style and finally deliver the meat of the action we usually have to wait one long introductory movie for. Imagine: if and when the current Spider-Man movie franchise finally collapses (hopefully after I get my Venom movie!), Sony—or Marvel Studios, if many fans' dreams come true—will reboot it for a third time and perhaps skip over the twice-baked Death of Uncle Ben story and skip to maybe a year after Peter Parker becomes Spider-Man—a long year of villain after villain, building upon his experience and mastery of his powers.

Obviously Ant Man's out of the picture for this new storytelling approach, but what other Marvel Studios films would you like to see receive the "No more origin stories" treatment? How do you think Doctor Strange will be handled? Tell us in the comments section below, and follow Fanboys Anonymous on every conceivable social platform for more geek news!

Warner Bros. Changes Edge of Tomorrow's Title for Blu-ray/DVD Release

Posted by Unknown - Monday, August 18, 2014

This is a really strange one but it has come to my attention that Warner Bros. is attempting to play a little sleight of hand to get people on-board with buying the Blu-Ray or DVD of the upcoming release of the Tom Cruise sci-fi actioner, Edge of Tomorrow. It's almost like they are ashamed of the original title and want to feature the tagline more. The tagline for the film was:

Live.
Die.
Repeat.

The film, by all accounts, was a very well made film and I've been itching to see it. I wanted to catch it in the theaters but it was there and gone so fast that I never had a chance. Didn't get a chance to see it either? Never fear, because the Blu-ray and DVD are coming fast for release, plus a digital download, of course. Some sites are claiming Warner Bros. are kind of changing the title to the above tagline in order to mix it up or…to make people buy it more?

Download leaked Emily Blunt topless pics
I don't get this, or at least I'm not convinced this is why the DVD cover looks like this. Sure, they seem to be pushing this tagline, but the title of the movie is Edge of Tomorrow, end of story. Look at the edge (heh) of the cover here and it still says the actual title. Plus, the movie was that big of a flop; it made $364 million worldwide, which isn't hugely bad on a $178 million budget.

Warner Bros. would need a bigger reason to go this route to try to distance themselves from the film and the name; it's not like it was hated. In fact, it got amazing reviews from both critics and movie goers, but, for whatever reason, it failed to make a ton of money at the box office. Then again, there's nothing wrong with the studio using the tagline more prominently—something that might reach a bigger audience since it covered the posters as well. Maybe they're trying to relaunch the marketing for the film?

So did anyone see the movie? Was it good, great, or forgettable? Will the different take on the title/tagline work to generate buzz for the Blu-ray/DVD release? Sound off below.

FOLLOW AMT ON SOCIAL MEDIA

SUPPORT FANBOYS ANONYMOUS