Fanboys Anonymous

Spider-Woman's Ass Causes Uproar with Spider-Woman #1 Variant Cover

Posted by Saliv - Tuesday, September 9, 2014

Greetings, Fanboys and Fangirls! This is Sam Lascio, bringing you news on a very touchy subject: sexism in comic books.

You might be asking yourself, "Damnit, what happened now? Did someone introduce a female character who is a total idiot, but is hot? Did a current female character act sexy when she should be the symbol of female empowerment? Did a male superhero put down a female superhero?" Well, the answer is: none of the above! This time, a potentially racy variant cover has created an uproar. Why? Well, let's take a closeup look at it.

Spider-Woman's butt exposed in new variant cover issued by Marvel Comics.

Look! It's a heart…it's a couple hams pressed together…it's SPIDER-WOMAN! Specifically, it's the variant cover of the new Spider-Woman #1. Now, let's take a look at the full cover.

The new issue of Spider-Woman creates controversy with it's variant cover.

It doesn't take a genius to see why people have reacted negatively to this. At first glance, it does indeed appear suggestive. That is, until you look at it a bit longer (not for that reason) and realize that she's just in a wall-crawling pose. We've seen Spider-Man in similar poses, so why is it wrong for Spider-Woman? Well, Megan Friedman of Elle wrote a harsh review of the variant cover titled "This Is What Happens When Men Try to Draw a Female Superhero." The cover was drawn by renowned artist Milo Manara. In the article, Friedman said
"It's hard out there for a female superhero. When Wonder Woman finally ended up in a movie, the Hollywood powers that be made her look like Xena, cutting out all her campy fun. And when Spider-Woman gets a rare comic book series, she ends up looking like a porn star. […] Spider-Woman looks like she's simply covered in body paint, flashing the city she's ostensibly protecting. […] All in all, the image seems to toe the line of pornographic; imagine Spider-Man in that position instead, and the concept would have never gotten this far."
Strong words, and with many assumptions thrown in there. I won't touch on her Wonder Woman comments, but let's get down to business:
  1. Megan Friedman refers to Spider-Woman getting a "rare" comic book series, when in reality, she's had a decent run. Volume 1 (50 issues) ran from April 1978 to June 1983, Volume 2 (4 issues) ran from November 1993 to February 1994, Volume 3 (18 issues) ran from July 1999 to December 2000, and Volume 4 (7 issues) ran from November 2009 to May 2010. Now, those numbers aren't stellar, and she definitely hasn't had the attention other major heroes have gotten, like Spider-Man or Iron Man, but she's gotten more than some more well-known heroes, such as Hawkeye. Now she's getting a brand new series, so I wouldn't exactly call her series "rare." Common? Probably not, but not rare.
  2. She looks like a porn star? Really? Look, anyone with common sense can see that her butt is sticking out, but it's not like she's biting her lip, bent over a table, and waiting for some man to grab her ass and start plowing. Let's relax for a second. Also, saying she looks like she's in body paint and flashing the city? Does she not know that nearly all superheroes, male or female, have hyper-unrealistically tight costumes? You can almost always see every muscle, every vein, and yes, even every bulge in those tight-ass suits. So is she trying to make the case that when a man does it, it's okay, but when a woman does it, it's pornography? Doesn't that violate the very argument she's trying to make?
  3. "...imagine Spider-Man in that position instead, and the concept would have never gotten this far." Yes, let's try our hardest to imagine Spider-Man in such a pose. It would probably look something like this:

Spider-Man cover art compared to new Spider-Woman variant cover art from Marvel Comics.

So, if Spider-Woman is flashing the city and displaying herself like she's in a porno, does that mean Spider-Man is doing the same thing? No, it's the classic wall-crawling pose common among Marvel's Spider heroes. Also, this is a variant cover for Spider-Woman #1, so it's optional; if you don't want to buy it, you don't have to. For anyone interested, here's the official cover:

The cover of Marvel Comic's new Spider-Woman series.

As elegantly stated by YouTube channel host Maddox, "If you don't want to sexualize her, then don't sexualize her." I feel the whole argument comes down to some people shaming the human body and making sex this ugly thing that should be looked down upon. Even though I don't find the cover to be that big of a deal, I can still understand why it's a topic for discussion. Sexualizing the female body has been a problem in comics for a long time, and only in the past few decades has there been a shift in perception. However, shaming the artists who created the cover and comparing Spider-Woman to a porn star is downright disrespectful. When people try to make the argument that men would never be found in this pose, even though they have been, and that it's a grab for male attention, you also end up telling women what they can or can't do. Fans of Milo's artwork, both men and women alike, have celebrated it as empowering the female form and something that makes the public realize that the female body is nothing to be ashamed of. Also, to suggest that this happened because a man drew it is flat out sexist.

What do YOU think of the Spider-Woman #1 variant cover? Is it overly sexualized and degrading to women? Is it empowering? Should people stop putting labels to things when there's no reason to? Let us know what you think in the comments section! Thanks for reading, everyone! My name is Sam Lascio, and I am a Fanboy!

This news is a bit strange but up my alley due to my bodybuilding. That's right: I'm a muscle-headed dork. It seems as though Paul Rudd is now one too. During the filming of the not-yet-released Ant-Man film, the people fitting him for his costume have had to readjust their thinking due to Rudd's serious commitment to the gym.

paul rudd celebrity superhero film avengers film series
Co-star Michael Douglas said to MTV News: "Paul Rudd is ripped. He's been training and working out for this picture for a long time. He was so cut, that they had to soften his costume up, with all the built-in six-packs and all of that."

Though the film is not set to come out until July of next year, we are beginning to get a decent stream of tiny tidbits of information. I am trying not to read too much about it because I want to be surprised. With all the director shake-ups that have occurred thus far, it feels like a miracle it got made at all, or at least in a way it might be good.

Director Edgar Wright of Shaun of the Dead fame was attached for the longest time but left because of "creative differences," the equivalent of "irreconcilable differences" in divorce court. It's the PC way of saying they got into a fight about something and couldn't get it together fast enough or well enough to finish the film. This does not bode well for Ant-Man, but I think Rudd is an inspired choice for the part and I hope he slays it. I like the idea of Douglas playing the older version of the character from the '60s and Rudd as the one who takes over. That's pretty cool.

So will Paul Rudd be the next Robert Downey Jr. and take The Avengers into Phase 3 with a bang or a whimper? Sound off below.

They're the "best iPhones" the company has ever produced, Apple CEO Tim Cook said after the new iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus were introduced to a packed auditorium during an Apple event at the Flint Center for the Performing Arts earlier todaythe same place where Steve Jobs introduced the Macintosh in 1984. After rumors and months of waiting, consumers finally got a look at the next-gen of Apple phones.

Apple introduces their new iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus


iPhone 6 isn't simply bigger -- it's better in every way. Larger, yet dramatically thinner. More powerful, but remarkably power efficient. With a smooth metal surface that seamlessly meets the new Retina HD display. It's one continuous form where hardware and software function in perfect unison, creating a new generation of iPhone that's better by any measure. (Apple.com)

Bigger is better, and with iPhone 6's 5.44 inches and iPhone 6 Plus's 6.22 inches compared to the previous iPhone 5S size of just four inches, these new phones not only boast a larger screen (up to 5.5 inches on the iPhone Plus), they're thinner than ever with 6.9 mm for the iPhone 6 and 7.1 mm for the iPhone 6 Plus. The Retina HD display allows for 1334 x 750 resolution (iPhone 6) and 1920 x 1080 resolution (iPhone 6 Plus).

Comparison of the new iPhone 6 with the old iPhone 5sThe new 64-bit A8 chip has two billion transistorstwice as many as the A1 chipand allows for 25 percent faster CPU performance and up to 50 percent faster graphics performance. Apple claims the new phones have better battery life that can last up to 24 hours of 3G talking (iPhone 6 Plus) and up to 14 hours on the iPhone 6. Users can also enjoy a much improved Internet browsing: up to 12 hours on 3G, 14 hours of video playback, and 80 hours of audio playback.

While Apple has always attempted to innovate the next bigger and lighter piece of hand-held technology, these new phones are slightly heavier than last gen's 3.95 ounces. The larger iPhone 6 Plus weighs 6.07 ounces and its smaller counterpart weighs 4.55 ounces. It's not a significant weight difference (the iPhone 5s weighed only 3.95 ounces), but for a company that seems to boast its light-as-air products and puts all its efforts into making new products lighter than before, it makes all the difference.

A new 8-megapixel camera with true tone flash might not be the boost consumers want, but Apple is praising its "Focus Pixel" technology that allows the lens to move in and out to determine autofocus points. It's video capabilities will be able to shoot in 1080p HD at 30 to 60fps, and offers an improved slo-mo option.

Apple also introduced the phone's new payment feature: Apple Pay. Built into both new phones, it uses a new chip called the Secure Element, storing encrypted payment information that allows you to pay for items through your iPhone by using the Touch ID. Payments will be charged to the user's credit or debit card linked to their iTunes Store account. This may be the breakthrough for a future of card-less payment, and Apple reassures there's no need to worry about identity theft.


Apple Watch is a fitness companion that acts like a smartphone


After unveiling the new phones, Apple launched its Apple Watch: the highly anticipated new wearable device coming early next year. "Our goal has always been to make powerful technology more accessible, more relevant, and ultimately more personal," Apple wrote on its page dedicated to the Apple Watch. "Apple Watch represents a new chapter in the relationship people have with technology. It's the most personal product we've ever made, because it's the first one designed to be worn."

With a wide range of watch facesApple states there's "over two million ways to see time"this tiny gadget is not only marketed as a fitness companion, it adds a new way to communicate, offering easy access to mail, messages, and calls. The three editions of the watch, Apple Watch, Apple Watch Sport, and Apple Watch Edition, also mimics a smartphone, enabling users to use a variety of apps and take full advantage of Siri. Pricing starts at $350 and requires an iPhone 6 or iPhone 6 Plus.

Apple seems to be following market trends instead of creating them, cashing in on the new smart-watch trend and larger phones that almost match up to the market's smallest tablets (aka "Phablets).

Anticipation of the announcement fueled both excitement and disappointment, causing Apple shares to spike reaching 102.69 by 2 p.m., but it eventually fell 0.38 percent to 98.00. Last year, the stock fell 2.3 percent the day iPhone 5S was introduced, according to USA Today.

The new iPhones, available in Apple's usual silver, gold, and space grey variants, start at $199 for the iPhone 6 and $299 for the iPhone 6 Plus with a two year contract. Configurations include 16GB, 32GB and 128GB. Preorders start Sept. 12 and will be available on Sept. 19.

Will you be among the thousands lining up to grab the new iPhone 6 or iPhone 6 Plus? Let us know in the comments below.

The Walt Disney Company has been notorious for protecting its Mickey Mouse trademark, often going to great extent and filing hefty lawsuits against anyone who dares cross the giant corporation. Disney has now gone after electronic musician deadmau5, claiming his mau5head logo is far too similar to Mickey Mouse's ears.

Deadmau5 vs Disney legal issues over trademark

Deadmau5, whose real name is Joel Zimmerman, posted a series of tweets about the trademark infringements. "Lawyer up mickey," the 33-year-old Canadian electronic artist tweeted to his nearly 3 million followers in response to Disney's 171-page "trademark opposition proceeding" against deadmau5's application to trademark his logo in the United States.

Disney owns the copyright on the three-circle logo, emphasizing Mickey's popularity being easily recognized and used in films, cartoons, music, and increasing use in fashion since 1928. They claim that the DJ's mouse ears are "nearly identical in appearance, connotation, and overall commercial impression" to Mickey's "iconic" mouse ears.

The mau5head logo has been used around the world for almost a decade and is patented in over 30 countries, but it wasn't until Zimmerman filed for a U.S. trademark in 2013 that Disney began to take legal action.

Both logos feature a silhouetted round head with large mouse ears. The main differences are Mickey's noticeably larger head and smaller and rounder ears. Deadmau5's logo also features his trademark face. However, the similarities, Disney claims, are likely to cause confusion between the logos.

Disney's EDM remix album featuring various electronic musicians Speculating that Disney targeted him only after the Disney-themed remix album titled Dcontructed was released earlier this year, he said Disney "wanna cash in on EDM, too." The album featured remixed songs from Disney films, animated shorts, television series, and theme park attractions by various electronic musicians, including Daft Punk.

The popular mouse-eared DJ is determined to fight it out in court, firing back with a cease-and-desist after Disney allegedly used one of his songs in a cartoon without permission. "Ok mouse, I never gave Disney a license to use my track, so we emailed you a C&D," he wrote on Twitter, linking to a video on Disney's website titled "Ghosts 'n' Stuff Re-Micks." The 90-second video features short clips from Disney films, adding the caption: "Enjoy a spooky cartoon Re-Micks to the tune of Deadmau5's Ghosts 'n' Stuff."



The two-page letter, dated Sept 4, stated, "Zimmerman is unaware of any license(s) between Disney and EMI, Virgin and/or Ultra granting Disney the right to synchronize the Composition with the Infringing Video or to exploit the Master in any manner or media." The letter goes on to demand that Disney "remove or disable access to the materials indicated above and contact the undersigned regarding this matter with two (2) business days of receipt of this letter" or else further legal action will be carried out.

Deadmau5 added the tweet, "Lets test a theory, it takes em 10 years to oppose a trademark, lets see how long it takes em to take down a video." (So far it's still up.)

A Disney spokesperson responded to deadmau5's complaint, giving the following statement to Rolling Stone.
Disney vigorously protects its trademark rights, and we oppose Mr. Zimmerman's attempt to register a logo that is nearly identical to our trademarks for his commercial exploitation. Our opposition is not about the use of the Deadmau5 costume. The music was appropriately licensed, and there is no merit to his statement.

Deadmau5 tweets in response to legal actions with Disney

Artists, like corporations, use logos to distinguish their brand from competitors in the industry. Deadmau5's trademark of his mau5head was not to profit off of Disney, but rather to prevent others from exploiting his property, including items featured in his online store that include HD headphones, backpacks, and t-shirts. The main question in this case is not about the similarities between the logos but rather why Disneywhich is widely known to go after smaller entitiestook nearly 10 years to take legal action.

Regardless, Disney is a large corporation with more than enough money and lawyers to win this, but they will have to prove that deadmau5's logo is confusing enough to customers who are targeting two totally different audiences.

Do you think Disney is going too far to protect the Mickey ears, or do you think this lawsuit is just? Whose side are you on? Let us know in the comments below.

slender man drawing art scary creepy horror tentacles
On June 2009, a competition started in the Something Awful Internet forum. Users were asked to edit some sort of supernatural entity into real photographs, and despite various creepy entries, it was user Eric Knudsen's (a.k.a. "Victor Surge") that caught everyone's attention.

Using black and white photographs of groups of children, Knudsen added the ominous figure of a faceless tall man donning a dark suit.

Under each picture, Knudsen described eerie disappearances and named his evil character as "The Slender Man":


slender man slenderman meme internet scary creepy creepypasta

"We didn't want to go, we didn't want to kill them, but its persistent silence and outstretched arms horrified and comforted us at the same time... - 1983, photographer unknown, presumed dead"

slenderman slender original fire kidnapped creepy meme
"One of two recovered photographs from the Stirling City Library blaze. Notable for being taken the day [in] which fourteen children vanished and for what is referred to as 'The Slender Man.' Deformities cited as film defects by officials. Fire at library occurred one week later. Actual photograph confiscated as evidence.
— 1986, photographer: Mary Thomas, missing since June 13th, 1986."


More posts about the character soon followed, and the "legend" went viral. When Knudsen decided not to expand on Slender Man's motives and back story, others started to create various works of fan art and online fiction, which was constantly uploaded to a Creepypasta.com, a website for "scary paranormal stories and short horror [fiction]."

On that website, several authors took a stab at the Slender Man mythos, sometimes changing his habits, motives, and abilities. However, all stories continue to depict him as a tall, thin, featureless man, whose limbs are unnaturally long (in some stories he also has tentacles), and who prefers to inhabit the woods or abandoned places. In addition to all these unchangeable characteristics, Slender Man continues to live up to his original creator's intention: he is meant to trigger unease and terror in the minds of the readers.

Furthermore, Slender has also inspired different YouTube series and videos, the most popular being Marble Hornets, which has more than 250,000 followers around the world and 55 million views, video games, apps, indie films, and even a not-so-great Hollywood movie with Jessica Biel.

Slender: The Arrival, console game for PS3 and Xbox 360, is set to arrive late September.


Everything seemed to be all in good fun, but on May 31, 2014, the Slender Man legend turned grim.

teen girls mugshots guilty
Geyser and Weier
Morgan Geyser and Anissa Weier, both 12, lured another 12-year-old girl, a friend, into the woods and stabbed her 19 times, piercing her pancreas, stomach, liver, and barely missing an artery near her heart.

Geyser and Weier had discovered Slender Man months before on Creepypasta and believed he was actually real. They wanted to become what they called his "proxies," proving their devotion and showing to the world he really existed, so after months of planning, the girls decided to carry out their sacrifice during a game of hide and seek at the Nicolet National Forest in Wisconsin’s Northwoods, where they believed Slender Man lived.

drawing art meme creepypasta
Geyser's drawing of Slender Man
Their victim miraculously survived and the attackers are being charged as adults, facing up to 65 years in prison. One of the girls has said Slender Man watches her, can read minds, and can teleport. She also believed she talked to Lord Voldemort and one of the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles.

She has been deemed incompetent to face trial, and her prosecution has been suspended until her condition improves.

After this case hit the news, an unidentified Ohio mother gave an interview to a WLWT TV reporter stating her 13-year-old daughter, inspired by Slender Man, had attacked her with a knife.

The woman came home to allegedly find her daughter holding a knife and wearing a white mask and a black hood.

Although the mother recognized her daughter suffered from mental issues, she insists she never expected the attack to happen. Interestingly enough, the interview did not address if the mother had previously sought help for her daughter, even after finding disturbing writing in her journal: "We found things that she had written and she made reference to Slender Man. She also made references to killing [...] She even created a world for Slender Man in the game mine craft."

Unfortunately, the Slender Man "inspired" crimes did not end there.

Slender Man crime teen arson fire scaryOn September 4, 2014, Florida teen Lily Marie Hartwell, 14, admitted to setting her house on fire while her mother and younger brother slept inside.

The sun was still hours away from rising on that Thursday morning when Hartwell allegedly soaked a bed sheet and a towel with rum and bleach and started some light of her own. Once the fire started, Hartwell fled to a nearby park and went to sleep in a public bathroom.

At 1:45 am, her mother and younger brother were awakened by the smoke alarm and were able to escape.

mugshot teen girl guilty fire young
 "Mom, I'm so sorry. I don't know why I did it.
 Did any of [you] get hurt?"
Hartwell was soon found, arrested, and charged with two counts of attempted murder. Allegedly, she told the investigators she frequently visited Creepypasta, where she read stories about Slender and had downloaded an ebook version of the cult manga Soul Eater, which tells the story of Maka Albarn, a death god in training who must capture the souls of 99 evil humans and one witch.

She also said such stories reminded her of being bullied in school and disciplined by her mother. She added that the fire occurred after a fight with her mother. Once detained, she reportedly sent a text message to her family, apologizing.

In response to allegations that its stories generate violence, Creepypasta has released the following statement:



This wiki does not endorse or advocate for the killing, worship, and otherwise replication of rituals of fictional works. There is a line between fiction and reality, and it is up to you to realize where the line is. We are a literature site, not a crazy satanic cult [...]
I don't believe that it's [Slender Man's fault or of] horror writing in general that this happened [...] Scary stories and [...] slasher movies [do] not instill [...] a desire to murder [...]. Hopefully, the gruesome crime that happened in Wisconsin will not repeat itself again, and our hearts go out to the families affected by this crime.

manga cover cult scary killing horrorIt is really hard to understand how children can be guilty of violent crimes.

It is easy, however, to find a boogeyman at whom to point the finger.

Pasco Sheriff Chris Nocco, responsible for the Hartwell investigation, noted during a press conference that it is not believed her taste in literature was the cause of her actions but said parents should know that there are "things on the Internet that are disturbing and causing kids to lose a sense of reality and caused a horrible incident to occur [Thursday] that could've been tragically worse."

Do you think Slender Man was the one to blame in all these cases? Do you agree with the Creepypasta statement?

What do you think? Let us hear it!

Marvel Has No Plans for Iron Man 4 Film, Says Robert Downey Jr.

Posted by Saliv - Monday, September 8, 2014

Greetings, Fanboys and Fangirls! This is Sam Lascio, bringing you some news from the world of Hollywood!

Robert Downey Jr.—the man who gave us Tony Stark and kicked off the Marvel Cinematic Universe—said in an interview with Variety that the future of the Iron Man franchise isn't looking well. When asked about the possibility of doing Iron Man 4, Downey said:

"There isn't one in the pipe. No, there's no plan for a fourth Iron Man."
Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark aka Iron Man in the film Iron Man 3

Cue the sound of doves crying and children being let down. We know that Robert Downey Jr. had to renegotiate his contract to appear in Avengers: Age of Ultron and the so far untitled Avengers 3, but fans realized that a fourth Iron Man film wasn't part of the deal. This has led to huge fan speculation as to whether Tony will end up joining the Guardians of the Galaxy, as he does in the comics, or if he'll be killed in the second or third Avengers film, or if he'll be just a background character that only pops up here and there or is only mentioned on occasion.

Another idea that's been thrown around is that Marvel will simply recast the Armored Avenger. When asked if he'd let Marvel recast the character, he said:
"I like that the idea is that it would be up to me, like I'm casting director for Marvel."
Obviously Downey doesn't have authority over at Marvel Studios, but he's definitely been their cash cow for years now. However, with the success of Captain America: The Winter Soldier and Guardians of the Galaxy, who's to say Marvel even NEEDS Iron Man right now? Chris Pratt completely took us by storm as Star-Lord, people are going nuts over Rocket and Groot, Tom Hiddleston's Loki is still adored by fans, and Sebastian Stan's Winter Soldier has become a new fan-favorite. With Thor, Black Widow, and all of these other characters that Marvel hasn't even introduced yet (Quicksilver, Scarlet Witch, Ultron, Vision, Doctor Strange, Black Panther, Captain Marvel), do they really need a fourth Iron Man?

Look, if they announced tomorrow that Iron Man 4 starring Robert Downey Jr. would be part of Phase III, I'd lose my shit just like anyone else. Unfortunately, I really don't think Marvel needs Iron Man anymore. He's a great character, performed by a solid and much adored actor, and has been the backbone for the MCU, but he had his trilogy, he'll still be in the next two Avengers films, and there is a pool of characters yet to be utilized. I think it's time to share the love we've given Robert Downey Jr. to other great talents in the Marvel universe.

What do YOU think about Robert Downey Jr.'s words? Do you think they'll eventually do Iron Man 4? Will they recast RDJ if they do? Could Iron Man die in Avengers 3? Let us know what you think in the comments section! Thanks for reading, everyone! My name is Sam Lascio, and I am a Fanboy!

I tried, but there's really no better way to start off an article like this: It's morphin' time!

mighty morphin power rangers haim saban roberto orci megazord red ranger green ranger

It's true, ladies and gentlemen, the Power Rangers are on their way back to the big screen. We reported on it awhile back. After beginning its life as the 1992 Japanese Super Sentai show, and after being brought to America by producer Haim Saban the following year, the Power Rangers thrived on television every year (save a two-year hiatus), through to now. They've been in theaters twice beforeonce in 1995 with Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers: The Movie and again in 1997's Turbo: A Power Rangers Movie.

For this go-around, Saban teams with producer Roberto Orci and writers Ashley Miller and Zack Stentz (of X-Men: First Class fame) to once again put on film the story of five teenagers gifted with bright costumes and the keys to some excellent mechas. Orci has talked about reading a book of continuity the Saban company keeps regarding to the Power Rangers, and says he, Miller, and Stentz are sticking close to the canon to preserve the brand Saban has built.

...But what is that, exactly? Like I said, the Power Rangers have been on TV for 21 years and the show changes cast and concept basically every season. So what should we expect to see onscreen come 2016?

We can take some clues from Orci's comments about sticking close to canon, for starters. For all the different Power Rangers teams out there, few are as well-known or defined the formula so much as the original team. This may be nostalgia talking, but unless they're making a brand-new team to jumpstart a brand-new franchise—certainly a possibility—they're going to go with the original lineup of Jason, Billy, Zach, Trini, and Kimberly as the Red, Blue, Black, Yellow, and Pink Rangers, respectively. If this is the case, I'd also expect Tommy in as the Green Ranger, and hopefully as a villain first. The advantage to this is twofold: Saban can market their film to older audiences who remember the early days, and can entice newer, younger audiences with the promise of the “original” or “classic” or “first” team, whatever the marketing buzzword would be.

It's also likely that their origins wouldn't be too different. If it is a retread of the original series, expect to see Zordon and Alpha Five, and probably some backstory to explain their presence. If not, expect to see some variant of a celestial or supernatural being giving the Rangers guidance, with help from a sidekick. And as for the villains? In the original few seasons, Rita Repulsa, essentially a space witch, would routinely send her monstrous creations to Earth to wreak havoc on the Rangers' hometown of Angel Grove. Later, it was revealed she was just the first wave of evil attempting to overtake our world, as Lord Zedd stepped into the picture and basically did all the same things she did to stop the Rangers.

rita repulsa lord zedd mighty morphin power rangers haim saban roberto orci
The faces of sheer evil.
Effectively, there's a whole power struggle happening in the cosmos, and different vassals of this evil keep occupying moon bases from which they try to take over Earth. Later series see villains from other dimensions and throughout time making trouble for the Rangers. If this film is an attempt to create a new Power Rangers franchise on film, not just on TV, I think it's probable Orci, Miller, and Stetz will build up this cosmic struggle and introduce a new kind of mythology to the Rangers. Perhaps they'll be legacy heroes, like the Phantom or Black Panther, their mantles passed from host to host. Perhaps they'll be a brand-new answer to an old threat.

I wonder, too, if their individual abilities will be beefed up. Power Rangers are often referred to as superheroes, but I never thought of them as such as a kid. They were like the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, a breed apart. But there is precedent for the Rangers having powers outside of their suits, weapons, and Zords. A few series in the mid-to-late 2000s gifted the Rangers with abilities like magic or genetic modification. With the marked increase in studios' superhero output, it's another possibility to watch out for. All that said, I return to Orci's comment about sticking close to canon. There will likely be some world-building embellishments the new creative team throws in, but the basic formula is unlikely to change.

There's an idea that members of the original cast could cameo in some fashion, but seeing as there isn't even a script yet, fan service like that should be far from the most important thing to considerif they're really doing this, which they seem to be. The one thing we know for certain is the release date. Mighty Morphin' Power Rangers hits theatres on July 22, 2016.

Think it'll have the same magic as the original television shows? Sound off below.

As we head into the final stretch of Marvel's Phase 2 for The Avengers' initiative, we get the word straight from Captain America himself, Chris Evans, on where the character and series may be going. With the massive success the Marvel Cinematic Universe is enjoying, it's difficult to fathom that these characters were second tier and considered risky to develop as full featured properties in the film world.

Evans had this to say about the ongoing world of The Avengers:

"Every time a new film is announced, there is this surge of excitement to where they are gonna go. I think with 'Cap 3,' we're going to continue this excitement."
chris evans nude pics leaked online
I feel the same way, Chris. Though the star is nearing the end of his original six picture deal, there's a bit left to play out before he hands over the shield. In another few years, we'll be seeing the Marvel Universe switch gears, dropping some characters as they integrate news ones (this happened a lot in the comics for this team so it's no big deal), but how they go about changing characters, especially those wearing the same name/title/whatever, is fraught with challenges.

The current Captain America has also stated he is enjoying playing the character, so while there are no immediate plans to switch him out for someone else, the seeds have already been planted. I thought The Falcon was an excellent addition to The Winter Soldier, and actor Anthony Mackie did a fantastic job in the role. There's another character in the running to be the next Captain down the line, but I don't want to get into spoilers.

So can Marvel get away with switching actors for the same role/character like they have with James Bond or will it be a completely different interpretation of the character? Will Chris Evans stick around longer? Should he stay or should he go? Sound off below.

The Inbetweeners cast
The Inbetweeners (UK)title card.
The Inbetweeners as a serialized TV show was a British creation that, at the time of initial viewing, I thought was exceptionally novel or unique. Never before (or so I thought) had a British scriptwriter addressed that awkward stage akin to purgatory between childhood and adulthood. However, as is often the case, I thought wrong. Yes, for those of you who have seen The Inbetweeners (either the British or the American adaptation), much of the viewing enjoyment is derived from sharing with the boys their experiences as they get into one farcical or ridiculous situation after another and then have to deal with the inevitable consequences. However, an all-the-more accurate portrayal of this British "inbetween" life stage hit British TV screens some 30-odd years earlier, and although billed as a children's TV show—to coin a phrase that seems to have been invented by the BBC to describe their TV programs (sometimes inaccurately)—Tucker's Luck  truly is "gritty."

Title card for Tucker's Luck
Tucker's Luck title card.
Produced, set, and aired in the early 1980s, Tucker's Luck is a spinoff of Grange Hill, an exceptionally long-running serialized children's TV drama set in a fictitious (yet in many ways realistic) secondary school in suburban London. Over its 30-year run, the series naturally evolved; however, the initial 4 seasons or so followed the lives of several characters as they progressed through their school years from the first to fifth years (this is not what they are called, but to make it easy for anyone not familiar with the English school system, these seasons chart the progress of the students from approximately ages 11–16).

Naturally, the show does not merely reflect the students' academic progress and engagement in lessons—that would be exceptionally boring—but instead uses lessons and the school as a catalyst or springboard from which the viewer is taken on a journey of exploration, gaining insight into the trials and tribulations of being a teenager. Topics include issues such as dealing with bullies, peer pressure surrounding drinking and taking drugs, whether to push someone in a swimming pool or play a juvenile prank on a fellow classmate, and so on. In many ways, the series was intended to act as a form of parable or instructional device; the show has no overarching narration, but the action is shaped so that the consequences of unwise decisions are demonstrated, often in very stark ways. Indeed, in some episodes highlights or cliffhangers have included students dying (on camera) of drug overdoses or as a result of falling through the roof of unsafe buildings due to misadventure.

Grange Hill title card
Grange Hill early seasons title card.
Three of the main characters with whom British children would have been intimately acquainted (via watching Grange Hill over the prior 4 seasons) continue their journey toward adulthood in Tucker's Luck. These are Peter "Tucker" Jenkins (thus the luck or perhaps misfortune of Peter is referenced in the title), Alan Humphries, and Tommy Watson. All three got into many adventures and scrapes throughout their Grange Hill school careers, in many ways paralleling their Inbetweeners counterparts in the latter stages, and this is all the more apparent when we see them again in Tucker's Luck. Yes, although puerile humor and sexual references to women/girls were much less evident in Grange Hill, fundamentally the boys are similar in their "normality": they are not especially good looking, strong, intelligent, or rich. However, neither are they ugly, weak, mentally challenged, or poor. Thus, a vast majority of the audience can relate to them very well.

These everyman characters leave school with little or no qualifications and attempt to find work in a very difficult market. Recession is gripping Britain both on and off screen, and without any real plan or structure to their lives, the first season seems to simply chart how the characters idle away their time drinking, recovering from hangovers, and visiting the Job Centre (the British equivalent of the welfare office). Along the way, Alan's father dies, saddling both Alan and his paternal uncle with debt and forcing them to sell both their family home and small construction business; Tucker's dad walks out of the family home never to return; and Tucker's kid sister goes missing for several days, prompting a huge search operation.

Characters in Tucker's Luck
No, this is not the first line-up for New Kids on the Block,
they are the main characters in Tucker's Luck from left to right
Tommy Watson, Peter "Tucker" Jenkins and Alan Humphries.
This all sounds rather negative and more of an endurance than a pleasure to watch. However, what makes this show so interesting is the way the characters mature and, in the latter episodes, triumph over adversity and gain some direction in their lives: Tucker finally admits defeat and realizes that he must gain qualifications in vehicle mechanics before he will be given a job in a garage, so he enrolls on a college course, and Tommy joins the navy. All of this action is set against the backdrop of '80s British working class society in London, and from a sociohistorical context—especially to someone born in the '80s—this proves to be very interesting.

Although The Inbetweeners is much more upbeat and somewhat more shallow in its oversimplification of how many suburban teens emerge from childhood innocence in the most clumsy way possible, it is perhaps the perception that these individuals are outcasts—almost pariahs on the edge of a society that they themselves do not feel part of—that makes them endearing to the viewer. In the case of Tucker's Luck, it's not just the main characters who cannot find work; countless others are also in this situation. In the Inbetweeners, countless people are pathetic in their normality; they don't have loads of girlfriends or excellent sex lives, but they do have hang-ups, embarrassing illnesses, and parents who care about them—much like the viewers at home.

Do you remember Tucker's Luck? Did you like it? Feel free to share your memories of it or the '80s in general in the comments below.

AMC's The Walking Dead Will Get Zombie Apocalypse Companion Series

Posted by Unknown - Sunday, September 7, 2014

This has been rumored for some time now, and it's officially a reality. Ever since The Walking Dead crushed all ratings and expectations during its inaugural season, there have been rumors and Internet chatter about AMC looking to expand the universe with spinoffs taking place in the same world. Now it's happening, as AMC has ordered a pilot episode for the yet-unnamed series. This is super awesome news, depending on how they go with it.

walking dead season 5 upcoming spin off seriesIf they coordinate storylines, perhaps showing another group of Zombie Apocalypse survivors in another part of the world and how they relate to what the original cast is doing, it could be great. But then how do you distinguish the new cast from the core group with Rick? My fear is that they will simply attempt to rehash the same kinds of situations, with a weekly zombie attack/human drama story, and it will be nothing but a cheap clone.

How do they give us more of the same but make it different enough to matter? They need to open up the rest of the world, maybe not go so far as some remote corner of the globe and what's going on there [it boggles the mind to consider the endless possibilities here, and thus the confusion inherent therein], but rather, something deeper about the outbreak itself and a possible endgame.

I don't know the comics. I don't know what happens at the end or if they ever discover what happened to cause the Zombie Apocalypse in the first place. However, my hope is that the end of The Walking Dead will not be a cop-out, à la Lost, and we get no answers. Please, please, please, don't do this, AMC! Finish the story and don't leave us hanging.

Will they drop the ball and give us endless seasons that go nowhere? An ineffectual, meaningless spinoff series that simply compounds the mysteries rather than answers questions? Sound off below. 

Digimon the animation 15th anniversaryFor those unaware, it was announced back in August that for the 15th anniversary of Digimon we would be getting a new series. However, as opposed to creating new stories, new characters and Digimon, this time we're going back to the season that started it all: Digimon Adventure.

The original Digimon Adventure title spanned out over two seasons, focusing on two different groups of Digidestined. This time, the original group that took a backseat during the first season looks to be the main focus, with the series being advertised via "Taichi, seventeen, high school days."

While the English version of the website simply states that Digimon is coming back, the Japanese variation includes their Twitter which features various other updates, not the least of which is an English and Japanese translation of the following picture:

Digimon when the waves below the pier begin to sway with the morning sunlight...

What it means is a little vague, and right now, not much more but hype. It will be interesting to see how they connect this story to the snippets of the cast's future that was shown during season 2's finale, such as Sora and Matt's relationship.

For those who may have missed the original announcement, here is the trailer:



We'll continue to post updates as they become available, so keep checking back to Fanboys Anonymous and let me know what you think of the anniversary special!

In the latest move by DC comics, and hot on the heels of Arrow's success, comes news of a TV series based on Supergirl.This is almost becoming a glut for DC on TV. They have Arrow about to start its 3rd season, The Flash coming into being, and the announcement about Gotham getting bought up by Netflix, plus Constantine forthcoming. I'm fine with all this. The more the merrier.

Greg Berlanti, the same producer and co-creator for Arrow and The Flash, is looking to take another DC character and transition onto the television screen. Warner Bros. TV arm will help produce the show so I guess this means it is a go. Not too many people know the character well, and this might be a tough sell at first, but I like the idea of getting something like this to the screen. They did a pilot with Wonder Woman but it failed to go forward.

sexiest superheroes Supergirl costume drawing
Supergirl, often portrayed as Superman's cousin, has morphed and changed over the years as comic book characters often do. It's unknown at this time which version of her they will focus on, as all of this is in the early stages. They haven't come up with a basic premise yet, but once they clear some copyright issues they will start pitching the idea to major studios to film.

There is a push to get more female comic book characters on the big and small screens, and I'm all for it. I mean, not to be a weirdo, but look at her. Yowza. I married my wife partly because she's built like this, a real-life comic book girl. Laura Vandervoort played the character on Smallville, but I'm sure they will look to go with someone else to distinguish between that show and this new one. Rock on, DC, you get my vote.

We'll see how this whole thing works out. I liked the trailer I saw for Constantine a while back. Anything gothic and horror inspired is great to me. If Supergirl works out, it will be the 4th DC show on the air, competing well with Marvel's TV lineup so far.

Are there any fans of Supergirl out there? Will DC do the character justice? Is there even enough in the mythos worth seeing? Sound off below.

Fanboys Anonymous is partnering up with TV Store Online for a special giveaway in honor of the 30th anniversary for the classic animated series Voltron.


win a free Voltron t-shirt 30th anniversary contestAlthough Voltron only ran from September 10, 1984 to November 18, 1985, it has ingrained itself in pop culture history and become one of the most recognizable icons of '80s cartoons. Adapted from the Japanese series Beast King GoLion and Armored Fleet Dairugger XV, the Voltron franchise has spawned everything from follow-up series to comic books, toy lines, and may even be receiving a live-action film adaptation soon.


To commemorate this occasion, TV Store Online and Fanboys Anonymous will be holding a contest where the winner will receive a free prize pack of 2 Voltron t-shirts!

Voltron costume t-shirt free Voltron tees 80s cartoons
Voltron Insert Head Adult Black Costume T-Shirt Voltron Defender of the Universe Adult Charcoal T-Shirt

HOW TO WIN


Participants can earn the equivalent of one raffle ticket for each of the following tasks they complete.
There are no limits on how many points you can earn:
 
1) Like the Fanboys Anonymous Facebook page [ www.facebook.com/fanboysanonymous ]

2) Follow Fanboys Anonymous on Twitter @FanboysAnon (and our former account which is now a backup @FanboyAnonymous)

3) Subscribe to the Fanboys Anonymous YouTube channel [ www.youtube.com/fanboysanonymous ]

4) Follow the Fanboys Anonymous Tumblr account [ www.fanboys-anonymous.tumblr.com ]

5) Share an account from above or FanboysAnonymous.com on social media [20 total points]

6) Earn 1 point for each website post that you share on social media [indefinite amount of points]

The more points you earn, the more chances you have to win! The winner will be chosen in a random draw and contacted through their social media account next week.

DISCLAIMER: The prize(s) that may be awarded to the eligible winner are not transferable, redeemable for cash or exchangeable for any other prize. If the winner has not redeemed his or her prize in 7 days, a new winner will be chosen. No points will be awarded to contestants who unsubscribe and resubscribe to an account. Only one point is awarded per account subscription. No members of the Fanboys Anonymous team are eligible to win.

Thank you for supporting Fanboys Anonymous and TV Store Online!

Confirmed Infinity Stones and Which Ones Still Remain

Posted by Saliv - Saturday, September 6, 2014

Greetings, Fanboys and Fangirls! This is Sam Lascio, presenting a little theory and discussion on the Infinity Stones of the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU)!

Now, most of the general movie-going audience probably isn't familiar with the Marvel Comics Infinity Gems, Thanos, or the Infinity Gauntlet, but this article will generally focus on the film versions of these items, not the comics. So when you see the phrase Infinity Gems, we're talking comics, and when you see the phrase Infinity Stones, we're talking movies. Ready? Let's jump into it:

Thanos using the six Infinity Stones aka Infinity Gems to attain supreme power in the universe
Thanos wielding the Infinity Gauntlet with all 6 Infinity Gems.

It is Thanos's ultimate goal to obtain the Infinity Gauntlet and the Infinity Stones. Although not stated in the films, it's assumed that the MCU version and the comics version should be about the same: whoever possesses the Infinity Gauntlet and the six Infinity Stones will obtain God-like power. We've met Thanos at the end of The Avengers and in the middle of Guardians of the Galaxy, so we know enough about him to draw the conclusion that he already strikes fear into the hearts of his enemies and is confident enough in his own power to fear no one in the entire universe. But enough about Thanos, let's get into the meat of the article: the Infinity Stones!

Marvel Comics Infinity Gems of Space, Mine, Soul, Reality, Time, and Power. They are used with the Infinity Gauntlet to give the wearer unlimited power.
The Infinity Gems of Marvel Comics.

There are six (6) Infinity Gems in Marvel Comics:

  1. Space Gem: Grants limitless manipulation of space, allowing for teleportation, dimensional manipulation, creation of wormholes, etc.
  2. Mind Gem: Taps the user into the universal consciousness, allowing for unlimited manipulation of psionic powers, including telepathy and telekinesis.
  3. Soul Gem: Grants limitless manipulation of souls both alive and dead. Also, it has shown to be able to evolve or devolve a being's physical self as well as his/her mental capacities.
  4. Reality Gem: Locally or universally alters the natural laws of the universe to the wielder's will.
  5. Time Gem: Grants total control over all aspects of time, including time travel, stopping time, slowing down or speeding up the flow of time, and to accelerate or slow down aging.
  6. Power Gem: Controls all of the power in the universe. It can be used to augment or inhibit any force.

So, I now ask you MCU nuts out there: Do any of these sound familiar to you? At least a couple of them should. Let's now run down my Infinity Stone theory in the MCU:

WARNING!! SPOILERS AHEAD!! TURN BACK NOW IF YOU DON'T WANT TO KNOW!!

Cosmic Cube Marvel Tesseract from Captain America: The First Avenger

The Tesseract: First introduced in the post-credits scene of Thor and the central MacGuffin of both Captain America: The First Avenger and The Avengers, the Tesseract (or "the Cube"), is an item of limitless energy. At the end of Captain America: The First Avenger, we see it rips open a portal to outer space and sucks the Red Skull into it. Also, in The Avengers, it acts as a doorway that transports Loki to Earth, opens the wormhole that allows the Chitauri to invade, and also allows both Thor and Loki to return to Asgard at the end of the film.

Infinity Stone: Space

Why?: This one has been confirmed by Kevin Feige, the President of Marvel Studios, which shouldn't be too much of a surprise, right? I mean, the Tesseract is pretty damn powerful, but we didn't really know about the Infinity Stones being a thing for sure until the end credits scene of Thor: The Dark World. I'd say with Feige's word, this one is a closed case. One special note, though, is that in the comics, the Space Gem is purple, but in the MCU, it's blue. This'll be important later.

Infinity Stone Aether Reality Gem

The Aether: Introduced as the ancient artifact of Thor: The Dark World, the Aether is a force that is said to have existed before the Nine Realms (Asgard, Earth, etc.). A unique feature of this item is that, according to Odin, it is the only Infinity Stone to be in a liquid form. Malekith planned on using the Aether to plunge the universe back into darkness so that he and his Dark Elves could rule again. He planned to accomplish this by using the Aether to convert all matter into dark matter.

Infinity Stone: Reality

Why?: This one has yet to be confirmed by anyone, but it's really a process of elimination/logic argument. It's obviously not the stone of Time, Soul, Mind, or Space, which leaves Reality and Power. In the comics, the Power Gem is red, which left us Fanboys all imagining that it's obviously the Power Stone. However, as we'll discuss next, the Orb from Guardians of the Galaxy is the Power Stone, which means the Aether has to be the Reality Stone. And this should make sense, right? In the comics, the Reality Gem alters the natural laws of the universe to the user's will. Who was the user? Malekith. What was his will? Converting matter into dark matter. So, it should stand to reason that the Aether is capable of doing more than just what Malekith wanted it for, making it the only true candidate for the Reality Stone. Back on the topic of color, this makes the MCU Reality Stone red, but the comics Reality Stone was yellow. Again, this will be important.

GOTG Orb Infinity Stone Power Gem

The Orb: The MacGuffin of Guardians of the Galaxy, the Orb's purpose is not understood for over half the film. We finally learn of its true nature when the Guardians take the Orb to Taneleer Tivan, aka "the Collector." It's here where we learn that the Orb is actually the container for a small purple stone of unimaginable and unequaled power. Simply touching the stone to the surface of a planet will destroy it, and no single being can hold it without being destroyed themselves.

Infinity Stone: Power

Why?: Well, for this reason:

Director of Guardians of the Galaxy James Gunn confirms to a fan via Twitter that the Orb is the Power Stone.

I'd say that pretty much confirms it, right guys? Which definitely means the Aether isn't the Power Stone, reaffirming my belief that it is the Reality Stone. Lastly, hammering home my point on colors, the comic book version of the Power Gem is red, but in the MCU, it's purple.

Is Loki's scepter the Mind Gem in Avengers?

The Chitauri Scepter: The scepter (or "staff/spear") was given to Loki by Thanos and the Other at the beginning of The Avengers. Using the scepter, Loki is able to fire blasts of energy, kill using the scepter's blade, and most importantly, control people's minds. By placing the scepter on an individual's chest for a moment, the victim's eyes turn black, then fade into a milky blue. At this point, they are Loki's servants. The only known method of breaking Loki's grip on the victim is a hard and quick blow to the head, knocking the victim back to normal. The last we saw of the Chitauri Scepter, Baron Wolfgang von Strucker of HYDRA possessed it, and it was somehow being used to give ordinary humans super powers (as with Quicksilver and the Scarlet Witch) in a post-credits scene for Captain America: The Winter Soldier.

Infinity Stone: No.

Why?: Fans have been speculating up and down that the Chitauri Scepter is the Mind Stone of the MCU. Here are a few reasons why Fanboys and Fangirls have been thinking this way:
  1. Thanos is the one who gives Loki the scepter.
  2. The scepter gives Loki the power to control people's minds.
  3. There's a scene in The Avengers where Loki, while holding the scepter, seems to mentally communicate with the Other.
  4. While on the Helicarrier in The Avengers, the scepter seems to be able to manipulate the thoughts and feelings of the group while they're arguing, even making Bruce pick it up without realizing it.
I admit, all of these points appear valid. However, here's my list of reasons why I feel the Chitauri Scepter is NOT the Mind Stone:
  1. Thanos has been tracking and collecting the Infinity Stones so that he may finally wield the Infinity Gauntlet. Would Thanos really lend out one of the Infinity Stones in his possession to Loki? Some pathetic Asgardian whom Thanos probably doesn't even respect or like? Now, the Other does say at the very end that the humans aren't as weak as they were promised, so maybe Thanos gave Loki the Mind Stone thinking it would secure him the Space Stone, but I just don't see Thanos as the type of villain who would let anyone else have one of his Stones. He wouldn't even let Ronan use the Orb in Guardians of the Galaxy, and Ronan seemed more like the kind of guy to get shit done, more so than a Frost Giant/Asgardian who couldn't even beat Thor one-on-one. It just doesn't seem like Thanos's style.
  2. As compelling as it is to assume the scepter is the Mind Stone because Loki controlled people's minds with it, how does banging someone upside the head break the grip of a freaking Infinity Stone? One warps reality, one can destroy a planet with a touch, one is an energy cube that can rip holes into the fabric of spacetime, but whacking someone's head breaks the Mind Stone's grip? I don't buy it. Not to mention the scene where Loki can't control Stark because of the arc reactor. Seriously? One of the six most powerful objects in the universe can't control Tony Stark's mind because the tip of the scepter's blade didn't "technically" touch him? Do you see how ridiculous that sounds now?
  3. I'll give you guys these two points: It is compelling that Loki telepathically communicated with the Other while holding the scepter, and that the scepter made everyone go ballistic on the Helicarrier. But how does the Mind Stone grant humans super powers? Seems better suited for the Reality Stone or something, wouldn't you say? Unless the gamma radiation from the Tesseract was able to mutat-…I mean, alter a normal human's DNA. Which brings me to my next point:
  4. In The Avengers, there are numerous references to the scepter being powered by the Tesseract. One Infinity Stone shouldn't have to power another one. Selvig says the reason why the scepter was able to shut the portal down was because it was powered by the Cube, and "you can't protect against yourself," or something. You could argue that one stone was able to beat another stone, and that's why it worked, but look at the scepter itself: the power source is BLUE! The Infinity Gems in the comics, and from the scene in Guardians of the Galaxy where the Collector was showing the backstory of the stones, it's apparent that the six Infinity Stones in the MCU (just like the comics) are all different colors. So, the Mind Stone and the Space Stone should not be the same color. I've made the whole "color" thing a big deal in this article, because the MCU isn't following the color scheme of the comics, and each Infinity Stone is a different color, so logically, the power source of the Chitauri Scepter cannot be a different Infinity Stone; it is as the characters say it is: powered by the Tesseract, aka the Space Stone.
So, for all of you readers not keeping score, that means the Power Stone (the Orb) and the Space Stone (the Tesseract) are the confirmed stones, while the Aether is suspected to be the Reality Stone. The Chitauri Scepter, in my opinion, is not an Infinity Stone, which means we still have the Time, Mind, and Soul Stones unaccounted for. So, how will these appear to us in the MCU? I've got some ideas:

Adam Warlock Easter Egg in Thor: The Dark World's post credits scene.

Adam Warlock: In the comics, Adam Warlock (aka "Him") is created in a place called the "Beehive" to be the perfect human. He enters into a cocoon to revive himself (long story, read the comics or Google it), hence the cocoon we see in Thor: The Dark World and Guardians of the Galaxy. James Gunn himself confirmed that inside the cocoon is Adam Warlock.

Infinity Stone: Soul

Why?: In the comics, Adam Warlock possessed the green Soul Gem! Do you see the significance now? Granted, in the MCU, there's a strong possibility the Soul Stone won't be green, but it's the most likely source we have at the moment, especially considering you eagle-eyed geeks. Confused about what I mean? Well in the post-credits scene of Guardians of the Galaxy, if you're quick enough to catch it, you'll notice that in the rubble, the cocoon is broken—and empty! This means that Adam Warlock is walking around the MCU! This, on top of Gunn saying that he wants to introduce a new member to the Guardians of the Galaxy in the sequel, points to Warlock. Again, you may ask why, and the answer is: Adam Warlock is a member of the Guardians in the comics! The sequel to Guardians of the Galaxy is practically writing itself.

Doctor Stephen Strange is Earth's Sorcerer Supreme

Doctor Strange: Dr. Stephen Strange, once the world's greatest and most egotistical neurosurgeon, shatters the bones in his hands in an automobile accident. Seeking a cure that medical science cannot provide, Strange seeks out the help of the mystical arts and finds himself in the company of a monk known as the Ancient One in the Himalayas. Using artifacts such as the Eye of Agamotto, the Orb of Agamotto, the Book of the Vishanti, and the Cloak of Levitation, Stephen becomes Earth's next Sorcerer Supreme and one of the Marvel Universe's greatest heroes.

Infinity Stone: Time or Mind

Why?: This is purely an educated guess, but Doctor Strange makes perfect sense to introduce another Infinity Stone in. You have a guy who can enter other dimensions and uses ancient artifacts as the source of his powers. I'd like to share a quote from Kevin Feige concerning the possibility of a Doctor Strange film:
"I just watched the Neil deGrasse Tyson 'Cosmos' series, which is amazing, and which may as well be an acid trip. It is mind-bending and it's all based in physics and based in quantum mechanics. We're going to play a lot with the notion of that as an explanation for how the sorcerers do what they do."
Since the Reality Stone isn't necessarily confirmed, part of me wanted to imagine that this stone might be linked to Doctor Strange, but if they want to explain Strange's magic using quantum physics, then it stands to reason that there's no need to warp reality here; it'll all be based on the normal workings of the universe. As someone who studied quantum mechanics and physics in college, this is exciting to me, and it's why I feel either the Mind Stone or the Time Stone would suit this film.

This leaves only the Infinity Gauntlet undiscussed. As many Marvel fans know, the Infinity Gauntlet was an Easter Egg in Thor:

Infinity Stones easter egg in Thor weapons vault

Since we know at the end of Thor: The Dark World that Loki is now posing as Odin and sitting on the throne of Asgard, the only way for Thanos to obtain the Infinity Gauntlet is to either invade Asgard or force Loki to cough it up. Or, if the rumors are true and the third Thor film will involve the Norse apocalypse, the Ragnarok, it's possible in the chaos of that film that someone steals the Gauntlet and delivers it to Thanos. There are so many possible scenarios that can play out right now that it's nearly impossible to know what Feige is planning next.

So, if the Chitauri Scepter isn't the Mind Stone, and Doctor Strange does contain an Infinity Stone in the film, that leaves one missing, either Time or Mind, depending upon which is featured in Doctor Strange. Honestly, it's still up in the air to me how everything will fall into place. What do YOU think will happen? Is the scepter the Mind Stone? Will Adam Warlock appear in Guardians 2 and have the Soul Stone? Will Doctor Strange find one of the stones in another dimension? How will Thanos obtain all of the stones and the gauntlet? Let us know in the comments section! Thanks for reading, everybody! My name is Sam Lascio, and I am a Fanboy!

FOLLOW AMT ON SOCIAL MEDIA

SUPPORT FANBOYS ANONYMOUS