review | Fanboys Anonymous
Showing posts with label review. Show all posts
Showing posts with label review. Show all posts

THOR: LOVE AND THUNDER Movie Reviewpoint: Film's Hits & Misses Breakdown

Posted by Anthony Mango - Friday, July 8, 2022

On the latest edition of the Fanboys Anonymous REVIEWPOINT podcast, host Tony Mango breaks down the hits and misses of Marvel's Thor: Love and Thunder by discussing what worked, what didn't, and whether you should see it or skip it.

THOR: LOVE AND THUNDER (2022):

DIRECTED BY
Taika Waititi

WRITTEN BY
Taika Waititi and Jennifer Kaytin Robinson

STARRING:
Chris Hemsworth (Thor), Natalie Portman (Jane Foster), Christian Bale (Gorr), Tessa Thompson (King Valkyrie), Taika Waititi (Korg / Old Kronan God), Russell Crowe (Zeus), Jaimie Alexander (Sif), Chris Pratt (Peter Quill / Star-Lord), Dave Bautista (Drax), Karen Gillan (Nebula), Pom Klementieff (Mantis), Sean Gunn (Kraglin / On-Set Rocket), Vin Diesel (Groot), and Bradley Cooper (Rocket)

Thor embarks on a journey unlike anything he's ever faced -- a quest for inner peace. However, his retirement gets interrupted by Gorr the God Butcher, a galactic killer who seeks the extinction of the gods. To combat the threat, Thor enlists the help of King Valkyrie, Korg and ex-girlfriend Jane Foster, who -- to his surprise -- inexplicably wields his magical hammer. Together, they set out on a harrowing cosmic adventure to uncover the mystery of the God Butcher's vengeance.

Make sure to subscribe/follow on whatever platform you're listening, leave your comments on the videos or this post, share this with your friends and geek out with us!


WHAT DID YOU THINK OF THE FILM? LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW!

HD wallpaper Thor: Love and Thunder review
Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous on:
YouTube - Google Podcasts - iTunes - Spotify
and more!

Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on YouTube Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous on Google Podcasts Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on iTunes radio Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on Spotify

On the latest edition of the Fanboys Anonymous REVIEWPOINT podcast, the hits and misses of Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness are broken down discussing what worked, what didn't, and whether you should see it or skip it.

DOCTOR STRANGE IN THE MULTIVERSE OF MADNESS (2022):

DIRECTED BY
Sam Raimi

WRITTEN BY
Michael Waldron

STARRING:
Benedict Cumberbatch (Dr. Stephen Strange), Elizabeth Olsen (Wanda Maximoff / Scarlet Witch), Chiwetel Ejiofor (Baron Karl Mordo), Benedict Wong (Wong), Xochitl Gomez (America Chavez), Rachel McAdams (Christine Palmer), Michael Stuhlbarg (Nicodemus West) and Patrick Stewart (Charles Xavier / Professor X)

Dr Stephen Strange casts a forbidden spell that opens a portal to the multiverse. However, a threat emerges that may be too big for his team to handle.

Make sure to subscribe/follow on whatever platform you're listening, leave your comments on the videos or this post, share this with your friends and geek out with us!


WHAT DID YOU THINK OF THE FILM? LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW!

HD wallpaper Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness review
Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous on:
YouTube - Google Podcasts - iTunes - Spotify
and more!

Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on YouTube Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous on Google Podcasts Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on iTunes radio Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on Spotify

Sonic the Hedgehog 2 Movie Review Report Card (Making the Grade)

Posted by Anthony Mango - Friday, April 8, 2022

Welcome to the latest edition of Making the Grade—a review format segment here on Fanboys Anonymous where we break down the major components of something and give it a score based on the standard report card lineup: A, B, C, D, and F for a total failure.

The next report card is for Sonic the Hedgehog 2. Is it as good of a video game film as the first one, or does it fail to match its predecessor?

HD Sonic the Hedgehog 2 photos screen shots poster

Sonic the Hedgehog 2

Directed by Jeff Fowler

Written by Pat Casey (screenplay and story), Josh Miller (screenplay and story), and John Whittington (screenplay)

Starring Ben Schwartz (Sonic), Jim Carrey (Dr. Robotnik), James Marsden (Tom Wachowski), Tika Sumpter (Maddie Wachowski), Natasha Rothwell (Rachel), Adam Pally (Wade Whipple), Shemar Moore (Randall), Lee Majdoub (Stone), Colleen O'Shaughnessey (Miles "Tails" Prower) and Idris Elba (Knuckles)

Synopsis: After settling in Green Hills, Sonic is eager to prove that he has what it takes to be a true hero. His test comes when Dr. Robotnik returns with a new partner, Knuckles, in search of a mystical emerald that has the power to destroy civilizations. Sonic teams up with his own sidekick, Tails, and together they embark on a globe-trotting journey to find the emerald before it falls into the wrong hands.

WARNING - SPOILERS BELOW

STORYTELLING SUBJECTS

STORY: B+

Picking up from the last film, this movie jumps straight into "How is Robotnik coming back to Earth?" He manages to get out of the mushroom planet with some help from Knuckles, who is searching for Sonic for reasons that, naturally, get explored as the film progresses. Long story short, the Echidna tribe that was hunting Sonic and Longclaw in the first film was doing so to obtain the Master Emerald. Longclaw was part of a group of owls feuding with the tribe Knuckles belongs to and has hidden it on Earth, which is why she suggested Sonic go there, so he could take on the burden of protecting it. Knuckles also thinks it is his destiny and responsibility to obtain it. Meanwhile, Robotnik is just looking for the power itself and revenge on Sonic, who is struggling with a sense of responsibility in a different right, wanting to be a vigilante ("Blue Justice") and needs to learn how to be a true hero, rather than just use his powers for kicks. Oh, and Tails is there to...well, cause it's Sonic 2 and you need Tails, so he just popped up, mostly. He's the second-weakest part of the film, with the worst being the side plot about Rachel's setup for a wedding to Randall—a government agent tasked to infiltrate the family to see what's going on with the Wachowskis and Sonic.

For the most part, I think this is rock solid. My only suggestions would have been to trim the entire bar sequence and dance number, as that just slowed the pacing down to a halt and achieved nothing that the Sonic/Tails relationship couldn't have accomplished elsewhere, and to outright nix the wedding subplot. I know that was likely cooked up in part to excuse why Tom and Maddie aren't going on the journey with Sonic from the start and to quite literally give Rachel "something to do", but nobody is going to this movie for that plot. In fact, in the theater I was watching it, someone outright booed one of the scenes.

It's a logical progression to go for the Knuckles story and to, as Tom says it, give Sonic some friends he can identify with to round out this family. Since the first movie did the heavy lifting for a lot of the character-work, this one could simply hit the ground running. Overall, I enjoyed this story even more than the first.

And like everything that is mentioned here, keep in mind that this is not some Oscar-caliber film, but that's okay. A movie doesn't have to be in The Criterion Collection to still be a fun flick, especially when it's primarily for kids and fans of the franchise to just shut off their brains and have a good time. 

CHARACTERS: B

All the previous characters return in the same form as before. If you liked them the first time, you'll like them here. I do think Rachel's character was funnier the first time around, as she was written in a way most sequels suffer, wherein they amped up her "cooky factor" and went overboard, though.

Knuckles was a treat. Writing him as a super serious character to the point where he's almost dim from narrow-mindedness (lines like wondering what a baseball did to become his enemy and why he should hit it when they're just playing a game, for instance), was a lot of fun. His lines were easily my favorite of the movie.

Tails, unfortunately, was not. "Only Sonic the Hedgehog could (insert something normal)" Yeesh. I've always liked the Tails character in theory, but he definitely falls into the annoying kid sidekick trope in that practically everything he says or does comes off either too hokey or, well, childish. But hey, I'm in my 30s and this is a kids film, so maybe kids identify with him. He's supposed to be the younger brother archetype in a sense, who hero-worships Sonic, which is translated, but I just found the actual dialogue to be a little spotty.

As stated, the subplot of the wedding was a low point. Shemar Moore is great in a lot of things, but his whole "Actually, I might have fallen in love with Rachel on this assignment" trope was so eye-rolling Hallmark-esque bad. He served really no purpose and a tighter movie without that would have been better. I have some suggestions I'll get to later of how I would have potentially fixed this, with the benefit of hindsight.

TONE / ATMOSPHERE: B

ACTION: Solid action. Better than the first film, for sure.

DRAMA: The melodrama is still there, with lines coming across a bit too "after school special" in some ways, but for kids, it works.

COMEDY: This definitely isn't a movie that would make everyone laugh, and some jokes just fell entirely flat as they were purely "Hey, that's the thing!" type references, or just a little too juvenile for my tastes, but I did chuckle here and there.

ROMANCE: Nix the wedding angle, entirely. Other than that, there is no romance, but that's not what this film is going for, so that would have been okay to cut that and have zero romance angles.

TECHNICAL SUBJECTS

ACTING: C

Everyone is hamming it up. Some dialogue comes off stiff because of how Lifetime the melodrama can be. But everyone works to get the point across and Jim Carrey is the show-stealer once again.

Part of me thinks Jason Momoa, the original choice for Knuckles, would have been better. We'll see if he voices Shadow and if it doesn't sound like Idris Elba would have been better for that as a reversal.

VISUALS (FX, MAKEUP, COSTUMES, SETS): C+

Overall, the visuals are better this time than before, but there is still a bit of a disconnect for me with Sonic blending into the real world. Whenever he's interacting with something and they've made a CGI photo-realistic version of it (like the underwear in the first one), you can just tell something looks a little off.

AUDIO (MUSIC / SOUND): A–

So many missed opportunities. Tom Holkenborg has done some great stuff, but I would have loved to hear orchestral blends of previous tracks in the environments inspired by levels from the games. How is Sonic snowboarding and we're not hearing a symphony belt out Ice Cap Zone?!

EXTRA CREDIT

MARKETING / TRAILERS / POLITICS / SERIES DIRECTION / ETC: A

References are key here. We get Super Sonic, the Chaos Emeralds, the little hologram of Sonic makes the annoyed waiting animation, "Mean Bean" is the coffee shop as a reference to Dr. Robotnik's Mean Bean Machine, Sonic drinking the air bubble under water, the red airplane, and so on. Those are the moments that made the dedicated fans pop with joy, and that's what this was all about.

MISSING ELEMENTS, ALTERNATIVE IDEAS & SONIC 3'S FUTURE

One thing that was missing from the film that I feel should have been in it is Casino Night Zone. Why not have Tom and Maddie go to Las Vegas, rather than Hawaii, and you could tie that into there? It's not as if that doesn't have famous architecture that would be interesting to see characters zip around. Maybe say that they "won" an all-expenses paid trip there, if you want to get them out of the film, and have it turn out the government set that up to try to spy on Sonic without their involvement. Hell, you could even still play into the idea of a government agent trying to work his way into learning something with the family by having him pose as a random person who bumps into Rachel and works his magic with her, and they have an impromptu Vegas wedding, if you want the gag with the rings. Just a thought.

No love for Marble Zone? Disappointing.

I've always been fond of Nack the Weasel (aka Fang the Sniper...not sure why he has two names, when they could have just called him Fang the Weasel if they didn't want "Sniper" to be part of it). Maybe he can pop up in #3?

I think they missed an opportunity to have a robotic Sonic created by Robotnik. Have it start off all silver and then look more like the Mecha/Metal versions that are more blue and such.

Shadow isn't a character I'm all that interested in. The same goes for Silver. That's all from a generation that is beyond me. I'm less excited about the third film than the second, but I'll still be seeing it.

By the way...what is up with those hunters? We didn't get any explanation for them that I missed, right? Weird. Maybe that should have tied more into the animated show's robots, instead.

FINAL GRADE & ASSESSMENT

GRADE: B+ (Pass)

You know what you're getting into with this movie. If you liked the first film, I can't imagine you're going to dislike this one. To be honest, I liked this one better, in a lot of ways. I highly recommend it to anyone who is interested in checking it out, as it is one of the best video game films out there. It's not going to win any Oscars, but that's okay; especially when you think about the last Academy Award winning movie that you truly wanted to watch a second time.

WHAT DID YOU THINK OF THE FILM?

LEAVE YOUR THOUGHTS IN THE COMMENTS BELOW!

MORBIUS Movie Reviewpoint: Film's Hits & Misses Breakdown

Posted by Anthony Mango - Friday, April 1, 2022

On the latest edition of the Fanboys Anonymous REVIEWPOINT podcast, hosts Tony Mango and Caroline Mango breaks down the hits and misses of Morbius by discussing what worked, what didn't, and whether you should see it or skip it.

MORBIUS (2021):

DIRECTED BY
Daniel Espinosa

WRITTEN BY
Matt Sazama and Burk Sharpless

STARRING:
Jared Leto (Dr. Michael Morbius), Matt Smith (Milo), Adria Arjona (Dr. Martine Bancroft), Jared Harris (Dr. Emil Nicholas), Al Madrigal (Alberto "Al" Rodriguez), and Tyrese Gibson (Simon Stroud)

Biochemist Michael Morbius tries to cure himself of a rare blood disease, but when his experiment goes wrong, he inadvertently infects himself with a form of vampirism instead.

Make sure to subscribe/follow on whatever platform you're listening, leave your comments on the videos or this post, share this with your friends and geek out with us!


WHAT DID YOU THINK OF THE FILM? LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW!

HD wallpaper Morbius review
Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous on:
YouTube - Google Podcasts - iTunes - Spotify
and more!

Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on YouTube Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous on Google Podcasts Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on iTunes radio Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on Spotify

THE BATMAN Movie Reviewpoint: Film's Hits & Misses Breakdown

Posted by Anthony Mango - Friday, March 4, 2022

On the latest edition of the Fanboys Anonymous REVIEWPOINT podcast, hosts Tony Mango and Caroline Mango breaks down the hits and misses of Matt Reeves' The Batman by discussing what worked, what didn't, and whether you should see it or skip it.

THE BATMAN (2021):

DIRECTED BY
Matt Reeves

WRITTEN BY
Matt Reeves and Peter Craig

STARRING:
Robert Pattinson (Bruce Wayne / Batman), Zoe Kravitz (Selina Kyle / Catwoman), Jeffrey Wright (Lt. James Gordon), Colin Farrell (Oz / The Penguin), Paul Dano (The Riddler), John Turturro (Carmine Falcone), Peter Sarsgaard (District Attorney Gil Colson), and Andy Serkis (Alfred Pennyworth)

Batman ventures into Gotham City's underworld when a sadistic killer leaves behind a trail of cryptic clues. As the evidence begins to lead closer to home and the scale of the perpetrator's plans become clear, he must forge new relationships, unmask the culprit and bring justice to the abuse of power and corruption that has long plagued the metropolis.

Make sure to subscribe/follow on whatever platform you're listening, leave your comments on the videos or this post, share this with your friends and geek out with us!


WHAT DID YOU THINK OF THE FILM? LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW!

HD wallpaper The Batman review
Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous on:
YouTube - Google Podcasts - iTunes - Spotify
and more!

Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on YouTube Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous on Google Podcasts Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on iTunes radio Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on Spotify

SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME Movie Reviewpoint: Film's Hits & Misses Breakdown

Posted by Anthony Mango - Tuesday, December 21, 2021

On the latest edition of the Fanboys Anonymous REVIEWPOINT podcast, host Tony Mango breaks down the hits and misses of Spider-Man: No Way Home by discussing what worked, what didn't, and whether you should see it or skip it.

SPIDER-MAN: NO WAY HOME (2021):

DIRECTED BY
Jon Watts

WRITTEN BY
Chris McKenna and Erik Sommers

STARRING:
Tom Holland (Peter Parker / Spider-Man), Zendaya (MJ), Benedict Cumberbatch (Doctor Strange), Jacob Batalon (Ned Leeds), Jon Favreau (Happy Hogan), Jamie Foxx (Max Dillon / Electro), Willem Dafoe (Norman Osborn / Green Goblin), Alfred Molina (Dr. Otto Octavius / Doc Ock), Benedict Wong (Wong), Tony Revolori (Flash Thompson), J.K. Simmons (J. Jonah Jameson), Rhys Ifans (Dr. Curt Connors / The Lizard), Thomas Haden Church (Flint Marko / Sandman), and Marisa Tomei (May Parker)

With Spider-Man's identity now revealed, our friendly neighborhood web-slinger is unmasked and no longer able to separate his normal life as Peter Parker from the high stakes of being a superhero. When Peter asks for help from Doctor Strange, the stakes become even more dangerous, forcing him to discover what it truly means to be Spider-Man.

Make sure to subscribe/follow on whatever platform you're listening, leave your comments on the videos or this post, share this with your friends and geek out with us!


WHAT DID YOU THINK OF THE FILM? LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW!

HD wallpaper Spider-Man: No Way Home review
Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous on:
YouTube - Google Podcasts - iTunes - Spotify
and more!

Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on YouTube Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous on Google Podcasts Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on iTunes radio Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on Spotify

NO TIME TO DIE: A Review to a Kill (James Bond 007 Podcast) Episode 0034

Posted by Anthony Mango - Monday, October 11, 2021

On episode 0034 of the Fanboys Anonymous A REVIEW TO A KILL podcast, hosts Tony Mango, Callum Wiggins and Robert DeFelice discuss the 007 elements of the James Bond film No Time to Die including the gadgets, the girls, the villains, the quips, the music and more.

NO TIME TO DIE:

DIRECTED BY
Cary Joji Fukunaga

WRITTEN BY
Neal Purvis (screenplay and story), Robert Wade (screenplay and story), Cary Joji Fukunaga (screenplay and story), Phoebe Waller-Bridge (screenplay)

STARRING:
Daniel Craig (James Bond), Léa Seydoux (Madeleine Swann), Rami Malek (Lyutsifer Safin), Lashana Lynch (Nomi), Ralph Fiennes (M), Ben Whishaw (Q), Naomie Harris (Eve Moneypenny), Rory Kinnear (Tanner), Billy Magnussen (Logan Ash), Jeffrey Wright (Felix Leiter), David Dencik (Valdo Obruchev), Dali Benssalah (Primo (Cyclops)) with Ana de Armas (Paloma) and Christoph Waltz (Ernst Stavro Blofeld)

Recruited to rescue a kidnapped scientist, globe-trotting spy James Bond finds himself hot on the trail of a mysterious villain, who's armed with a dangerous new technology.

Make sure to subscribe/follow on whatever platform you're listening, leave your comments on the videos or this post, share this with your friends and geek out with us!


WHAT DID YOU THINK OF THE FILM? LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW!

James Bond A Review to a Kill 007 podcast
Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous on:
YouTube - Google Podcasts - iTunes - Spotify
and more!

Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on YouTube Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous on Google Podcasts Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on iTunes radio Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on Spotify

VENOM: LET THERE BE CARNAGE Movie Reviewpoint: Film's Hits & Misses Breakdown

Posted by Anthony Mango - Friday, October 1, 2021

On the latest edition of the Fanboys Anonymous REVIEWPOINT podcast, host Tony Mango breaks down the hits and misses of Venom: Let There Be Carnage by discussing what worked, what didn't, and whether you should see it or skip it.

VENOM: LET THERE BE CARNAGE (2021):

DIRECTED BY
Andy Serkis

WRITTEN BY
Kelly Marcel (screenplay and story) and Tom Hardy (story)

STARRING:
Tom Hardy (Eddie Brock / Venom), Woody Harrelson (Cletus Kasady / Carnage), MIchelle Williams (Anne Weying), Naomie Harris (Frances Barrison / Shriek), Reid Scott (Dr. Dan Lewis), Peggy Lu (Mrs. Chen) and Stephen Graham (Detective Mulligan)

After finding a host body in investigative reporter Eddie Brock, the alien symbiote must face a new enemy, Carnage, the alter ego of serial killer Cletus Kasady.

Make sure to subscribe/follow on whatever platform you're listening, leave your comments on the videos or this post, share this with your friends and geek out with us!


WHAT DID YOU THINK OF THE FILM? LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW!

HD wallpaper Venom: Let There Be Carnage review
Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous on:
YouTube - Google Podcasts - iTunes - Spotify
and more!

Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on YouTube Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous on Google Podcasts Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on iTunes radio Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on Spotify

On the latest edition of the Fanboys Anonymous REVIEWPOINT podcast, host Tony Mango breaks down the hits and misses of Marvel's Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings by discussing what worked, what didn't, and whether you should see it or skip it.

SHANG-CHI AND THE LEGEND OF THE TEN RINGS (2021):

DIRECTED BY
Destin Daniel Cretton

WRITTEN BY
Dave Callaham (screenplay and story), Destin Daniel Cretton (screenplay and story), Andrew Lanham (screenplay), based on the Marvel comics by Steve Englehart and Jim Starlin

STARRING:
Simu Liu (Shaun / Xu Shang-Chi), Tony Leung (Xu Wenwu), Awkwafina (Katy), Meng'er Zhang (Xu Xialing), Fala Chen (Li), Florian Munteanu (Razor Fist), Wah Yuen (Master Guang Bo), Andy Le (Death Dealer) and Michelle Yeoh (Ying Nan)

Martial-arts master Shang-Chi confronts the past he thought he left behind when he's drawn into the web of the mysterious Ten Rings organization.

Make sure to subscribe/follow on whatever platform you're listening, leave your comments on the videos or this post, share this with your friends and geek out with us!


WHAT DID YOU THINK OF THE FILM? LEAVE YOUR COMMENTS BELOW!

HD wallpaper Shang-Chi and the Legend of the Ten Rings review
Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous on:
YouTube - Google Podcasts - iTunes - Spotify
and more!

Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on YouTube Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous on Google Podcasts Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on iTunes radio Subscribe to Fanboys Anonymous podcast on Spotify

The Suicide Squad (2021) Movie Review Report Card (Making the Grade)

Posted by Anthony Mango - Friday, August 6, 2021

Welcome to the latest edition of Making the Grade—a review format segment here on Fanboys Anonymous where we break down the major components of something and give it a score based on the standard report card lineup: A, B, C, D, and F for a total failure.

The next report card is for the latest DC film and sequel to Suicide Squad, oddly enough entitled The Suicide Squad (2021).

HD The Suicide Squad photos screen shots poster

The Suicide Squad (2021)

Written and Directed by James Gunn

STARRING: Idris Elba (Robert DuBois / Bloodsport), Margot Robbie (Harley Quinn), John Cena (Christopher Smith / Peacemaker), Joel Kinnaman (Colonel Rick Flag), Viola Davis (Amanda Waller), Daniela Melchior (Ratcatcher 2), David Dastmalchian (Polka-Dot Man), Peter Capaldi (Thinker), Alice Braga (Sol Soria), Jai Courtney (Captain Boomerang), Michael Rooker (Savant), Nathan Fillion (T.D.K.), Pete Davidson (Blackguard), Sean Gunn (Weasel / Calendar Man), Taika Waititi (Ratcatcher), Flula Borg (Javelin), Mayling Ng (Mongal), Dee Bradley Baker (Sebastian), and Sylvester Stallone (Nanaue / King Shark)

WARNING - SPOILERS BELOW

STORYTELLING SUBJECTS

STORY: B

Considering the general premise of the Suicide Squad team is always "Task Force X is made up of a bunch of villains and antiheroes who are sent on a deadly mission and let's have fun watching them take out the bad guy or achieve their goal", you know what you're getting into when you see this film. It's not the most intricate story in the world with a complex weave and tons of twists.

With that being said, that's not to say this was bad on a story side of things. Again, I knew full well what I was getting into and it served its purpose well.

I do deduct some points for copying a similar story to what Deadshot had with Bloodsport. It sort of feels as though Deadshot's character was meant to return, Will Smith didn't/couldn't, and instead of recasting the role and getting backlash, they just did a "replace all" in their Word doc and changed the character name, added one scene of "He's a jerk to his daughter, though" and said "Good enough." That part of the story was weak for me.

The overall redemption arc for the characters works. The mission for Starro is good enough, even if the villains leave much to be desired. It's a solid B.

CHARACTERS: A–

An ensemble film like this lends itself to having tons of characters—some of which are great, others are just okay.

The least of the bunch would be Mongal. She contributed nothing, wasn't memorable and I doubt anyone would consider her a better character than even Milton.

The core cast and some of the supporting ones, though, are great. Peacemaker was definitely my favorite character of the bunch. Ratcatcher 2 was surprisingly endearing. I liked Rick Flag better this time around than last time. Harley Quinn is always a win. King Shark was awesome. Polka-Dot Man stole the show in many scenes.

Alice Braga's character? Pass. The temporary team like T.D.K. were great for their bits. Weasel, too. It was good to see Captain Boomerang back, but I think he was a bit wasted and mostly just brought in for a surprising kill.

Again, points taken away for the villains. I couldn't even tell you any of their names.

TONE / ATMOSPHERE: A–

ACTION: Great action sequences that were fun from start to finish. Solid A.

DRAMA: This film doesn't take itself too seriously, so the dramatic elements aren't as strong as something that's a legitimate drama. If you judge it based off that, it's about a C.

COMEDY: Absolute A+. This was the film's strength, to no surprise.

ROMANCE: While it doesn't technically classify as romance in a traditional sense, I think the Harley love sequence stuff went on a little bit too long for what it was worth and the father/daughter relationship between Bloodsport and Ratcatcher was fine, but a bit forced.

TECHNICAL SUBJECTS

ACTING: B

Everyone nails their parts. I just can't score it higher because there aren't any Academy Award performances in this film.

VISUALS (FX, MAKEUP, COSTUMES, SETS): A

All the characters looked great. The practical effects were impressive and the CGI wasn't wonky. Nothing at all to complain about. King Shark was delightful. Starro was cool.

AUDIO (MUSIC / SOUND): B–

Some of the placement of the songs was fantastic, but I can't tell you many songs that stuck with me beyond the music that played when King Shark was looking at the other fish in the fish tank. I'll be grabbing the score at some point and I might end up changing this rating based on listening to it outside of the film itself, and upon a rewatch of the movie.

The audio itself, I saw no problems with. Then again, I know nothing about sound design/mixing, so unless it's bad and problematic, I just write it off as a good thing.

EXTRA CREDIT

I hate the title. You shouldn't have two films where one is the same title but with just "The" in front of it. It should have been called something else with a subtitle (just not "Suicide Squad: Reloaded")

The marketing was very faithful to the movie. It didn't disappoint or paint a dishonest picture.

FINAL GRADE & ASSESSMENT

GRADE: A– (Pass)

This movie was a TON of fun. It's overall less structured of a film than the first one, but it has much better execution. I can definitely recommend it, even if you disliked its predecessor. As long as you go into it knowing it's goofy and you're ready for that kind of atmosphere, you're going to love it. That's where this film's strengths are and if you think it needs to be a serious movie like Batman v Superman or The Dark Knight, you're going to be disappointed.

WHAT DID YOU THINK OF THE FILM?

LEAVE YOUR THOUGHTS IN THE COMMENTS BELOW!

FOLLOW AMT ON SOCIAL MEDIA

SUPPORT FANBOYS ANONYMOUS